پژوهشنامه تفسیر و زبان قرآن
سال چهارم شماره 1 (پیاپی 7، پاییز و زمستان 1394)

"Faith" and "attitude" are pivotal concepts in religious teachings and social psychology. The outcome of close links between the fields of attitude in social psychology, education and practical issues in the Quranic issues, had made the term "attitude of faith". An attitude that the Quranic approach based on models developed in psychological attitude toward faith is formed. This paper uses analytical methods and commitment to tackle an interdisciplinary study and interpretation of the Quran, based on the patterns applied social psychology "The elaboration likelihood model " for development and change of attitude, were introduced by the main path through the model, the effective factors on the development of the attitude of the audience faith Quran and the model data for better understanding the verses of the Quran to believe guidance rivals. Based on the findings of this study, factors such as the Quran, "presented argument and reasoning", "epistemology verse," "Miracles of the Prophets", "create the look of true knowledge of the faith", "reminding and recalling the origin and Resurrection" and "justified Faith-oriented cognitive effects, "including the factors affecting the formation of attitude of faith in this approach introduces the audience through the main path.

Link of linguistics with the literature analysis and review of it, especially literary text is very deep and intertwined. In between text linguistics and textuality factors such as cohesion is more important. The issue of cohesion was first raised by Holiday and Hassan. It can be approached to three levels; vocabulary, grammar, and phonetics; still given the breadth of the topic, the present paper focuses on phonetic level of few phonetic factors such as rhyme (Saje), parallelism (Muvazat), paronomasia (Jinas), Iltizam, Tarsie, and Tasdir. It has been tried to survey the effects of these factors in cohesion of some of Sura of the Holy Quran. It is notable that there is a paucity of studies on phonetic structure of the Holy Quran. Thereby, the mentioned factors were analyzed in some of the Sura (Qamar, Rahman, and Vaqia) through general induction reasoning. To this end, statistical data were used to measure frequency of each factor and their effect on cohesion of the text. As the findings recommended, rhyme, was the key factor in phonetic cohesion of the Sura and played key role in establishing relationship between the verses and general cohesion of the text. On the other hand, Tarsie had the least role in cohesion of the text. Phonetic factors Iltizam, parallelism, paronomasia, Tasdir is the next issues.

Context is the most important issue in the interpretation of the Holy Quran. So far, the context, definition, functions, scope and conditions of its use, several studies have been conducted. This article Regardless of all of them, with the functions and types of evidence in its context, to interpret and explain the difference between those verses that addressed similar words is different from the definition and indefinite names.
The study of this paper, Q 2:126 and Q 14:35, who were all exactly the same words and only the definite area and indefinite word "Balad " disagree. Analyze the context of each of these verses and the types of evidence contained in them, suggest that repeated these two verses, the word is not in any sense of work of art have the meanings are different from the other. According to the study, in explaining the cause of these verses, due to the different way in evidence as circumstantial evidence of verbal and non-verbal as well as the words and place of the revelation of this verse, played a special role and pave the way for effective. So to interpret and explain the ambiguous verbal verses should be considered the context and used all evidence in it.

The present study using the "content analysis" to analyze quantitative and qualitative criteria fields and Ijtihad of "Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari" and would vote in the study interpreted differently in "Jami al-Bayan" pays attention to the example of Islamic ijtihad to interpretation of the Quran and the use of the criteria of interpretation, preferring to explain the interpretation votes. According to the writer, Tabari in 1952 noted the different interpretation votes and commentary of their choice, the most prominent results of research on his interpretation main backgrounds and criteria, is as follows: (1) the main areas of al-Tabari, including "means of revelation" , "reading", and "Quranic terms".(2) Several of the six criteria he uses is "context and appearance of verses", "fame and consensus", "Arab language (syntax, rhetorical and literal)", "authenticity generalization", "true hadith of the prophet," and " Writing the Quran scripture" as well as a few of the four criteria of "reason", companion's viewpoint", "jurisprudential rules" and " history" has been interpreted in favor of the viewpoint.(3) Tabari is most widely used of the three criteria; "context and appearance of verses" (701 cases), "Arab Language" (603 cases) and "fame and consensus" (456 casess). (4) He in the field of "means of revelation" has more attention to "context and appearance of verses" (51%); in the field of "reading" to "fame and consensus" (64%); in "Quranic terms to "context and appearance of verses" (53%) and in "Quranic words" to "Arab Language" (44%)

Quranic stories have interpretive capacity in Kalam issues that being in the Sunni and Shiite traditional, exegetical, and theological sources, as well as those of Quranic sciences and explaining the domain of theological deductions. This article is an attempt to indicate the extent and level of the efficiency of relying on the Divine Book in theological deductions from Quranic stories and narratives in the field of Imamate, and then introduce the special place of referring to Quranic narratives towards proving the theological issues concerning Imamate as one of the efficient theological methods. The theological aspect, particularly theological issues concerning Imamate, has not been properly investigated. The large volume of verses on narratives and semantic consistency of narrative verses and non-narrative ones particularly on Imamate, and theological deduction of Imamate issues from Quranic narratives based on the Hadith of the holy prophet and his Household, his companions, and exegetical views of Shiite as well as Sunni scholars all indicate the necessity of investigation in this field.

One of the specific principles of moral exegesis is the morality of Quran’s teachings and language, in a matter that Quranic teachings could be considered moral as it matches with Fethrah, educative and moral goals of the messenger’s mission and revelation, and direct verses in observing moral rules. Thus Quran not only includes moral teachings, but also uses moral devices to convey its doctrine. Quran obligation to observe moral language in all language levels and different situations is considerable. Quran has chosen all the words, phrases and sentences it wants among infinite possible choices, and each time it has had the best choice. Where affirmation is not proper and does not fit the moral character of Quran, it has used allusion. In some cases it has maintained moral unity of the text by changing the structure of sentences. This essay also answers some criticism about some words or phrases used in Quran which seem to contradict etiquette and morality, by referring to the meaning of words in revelation era, indicating the allegorical meaning of some phrases, distinguishing between lexical and idiomatic meaning, and considering sentence structure. Thus we can conclude that language components have been chosen to accomplish educative and moral goals, so that in the relationship of the divine book with its addressees observe moral principles.