فصلنامه لسان مبین (پژوهش ادب عرب)
پیاپی 29 (پاییز 1396)

Considering the importance of teaching Arabic language in Iran, this paper aims to describe and analyze the prepositions errors committed by native Persian-speaking students.
After the classification of the errors, based on occurrence origin, most errors were related to interlingua, then intralingual, and ambiguous ones.
Then the most of interlingua errorss are occurred in letter" ba" so that The ba has used instead on the "ela" ,"ala" , and "fee" because of its similarities in both Arabic and Persian. Also, in the intralingual errors, the most common mistakes related to the use of other letters-especially "ila", "Ala" and "Men" instead of the "Lam". this indicate that the learner was mistaken for the inadequacy of the use of the Arabic of prepositions.
al errors indicates that Iranian students of Arabic have been greatly influenced by the Persian language. In fact, they think in Persian, and then write in Arabic. One of the reasons is that Arabic learning, unlike English learning, is not much considered in the early ages, and according to linguists, the later the learning of a language, the greater the probability of interlingual errors . Another reason is that Arabic and Persian language are in two different language clusters .The Persian belongs to the Indo-European cluster and Arabic to Semitic cluster.

Metadiscourse analysis is a kind of linguistic analysis that drags reader to beyond text and provides cooperative communication between reader and writer. In this field, Ken Hyland with providing of metadiscourse theory pattern has expressed a wide range to better understand for participatory communication between attitude of reader and author of the text. In this theoretical framework, writer has been used from metadiscourse different tools such as positive and negative attitudes (characters such as eloquent and weak), hedges (words such as May) and boosters (constraints such as inevitably) to express the values of a phenomenon, the doubts and certainty of a transmission. Study of criticism books based on this pattern is a criterion for determining of way critics attitude. This study try to investigate linguistic-rhetorical of »FY aladab e alabbsi, alroyat va alfan« book; Ezaddin Esmaeel’s work, with descriptive-analytical way and based on Hyand’s metadiscourse pattern. Results of study are that high percentage of linguistic categories in the following order: citations with 451 and transitions 335, demystify 324, collective self-mention 269 and interactive resources 246. This linguistic analysis implies to this work that writer has been provided most important role of reader beside himself.

The following paper is in an effort to attain a visionary framework for action analysis of Arabic to Persian poem translation. In this respect, based on formalistic studies, aspects and differentiations with other linguistic compositions are analyzed in order to gain basic criteria of poem. Analyzing poem structure based on four key criteria of structural art, theme, rhythm and system, we can review the action of poem translation in regard of recreation of poem characteristics. This review forms in focuses on the idea of recreation of Arabic poem form in the exact Persian form. Recreation of structural poem art, recreation of theme, recreation of rhythm, as well as recreation of the system. In the end, through this theoretic approach with formalistic point of view, we analyze the Arabic poems of Toghraee Isfahani, translated to Persian.