مجله حقوقی دادگستری
پیاپی 107 (پاییز 1398)

AbstractNowadays, Arbitration is an effective framework for resolving international commercial disputes. Most of the issues related to the international arbitration process allocate for the status, rights and obligations of disputant parties and the arbitrator. The Arbitration Agreement which is the legal basis of the arbitral proceedings only creates the legal relationship between disputant parties, therefore it does not deal usually with the legal relationship between the arbitrator and disputant parties that is effective in their mutual rights and obligations. The authority and position of the arbitrator empowers him to agree on his rights and obligations with disputant parties and whenever the expectation of the parties may endanger the arbitration process he will stand against the unreasonable demands of them and will organize their rights and obligations within a legal formal framework. The best framework accepted in some jurisdictions is the establishment of a separate contract known as the “arbitrator's contract”. The contents of this agreement include the most important rights and obligations of disputant parties and arbitrator which affect their position.

Certain Authorities of Religious Minorities in Iran’s Act and theEffects of Their DecisionsOne the innovations in the new act of family support is observed in article 4 for the authorities of religiousminorities. Concerning the competence of these authorities and their relationships with the judicial courts,legislators deny the competence of the general courts in hearing the minority affairs based on their religiouscommonalities and certain rules and habits. Moreover, given that these authorities are competent to hear thepersonal status and non-litigious affairs of the religious minorities and are legally recognized to do so, they canbe, to some extent, considered as an exceptional part of the judicial judgment institution. As a result, theirdecisions are valid in the courts and are ratified and enforced if they are compatible with the public order andmorality.Keywords: religious minorities, certain authorities, common and certain rules and habits, judicial system,judicial authority

In criminal proceedings, the victim is also entitled to certain rights that are at times not only not at variance with the rights of the accused, but are rather common to both parties. One such right, which is the cornerstone of a fair trial, is the right to a hearing by a competent court established by law and to have a qualified attorney familiar with due process present. The other right is the independence and impartiality of the court and the timeliness of the hearing. The safeguarding of these rights both in relation to the accused and the plaintiff is imperative, for failure to do so shall undermine public trust in the legal system with dire consequences. The main question of this paper is whether the fair trial criteria, particularly the ones mentioned above, are satisfied in the case of medical malpractice victims in Iran’s current criminal law. To find a conclusive answer to this research question, the present paper shall apply the three criteria of hearing by a competent court, independence and impartiality of the court, and hearing within a reasonable time to medical malpractice cases in Iran.

The new criminal laws that have been brought to the Islamic Penal Code by comparative and criminological studies are promising a new discipline in Iran's legislative and judicial criminal policy. Undoubtedly, the adherence of the judicial authority to each of the systems and practices of choosing the type and amount of punishment will have a fundamental impact on the criminal justice system and achieve its stated goals. The lack of comprehensive guidelines for determining punishment in the Criminal Code has led to the formation of non-consistent procedures in Iran's criminal tribunals, which not only resulted in the maximum and unjustified use of penalties such as imprisonment, but, depending on the kind of persuasive or exaggerated judgment, the issuing judge , Has led to the "happening of justice", while the type of crime and its effects are the same and the same. Hence, the principled and scientific procedure for the issuing of criminal sentences requires, on the one hand, comprehensive and precise review of the courts of appeals against the judgments of the first courts. On the other hand, at the level of legislative criminal law, the legislator should be in a set Use legal materials to determine the principles of the Code of Conduct for Determining Penalties to prevent unequal treatment in judicial procedures.

Abstract In the current legal system, despite the fact that for many years has been found the importance of procedure of proceedings to be in the strict sense of the law; But the legislator has not yet accepted that these two types of law have the same significance. On the basis of this refusal, Violations of the substantive rights always invalidate the verdict of the court, but violations of the procedural rights invalidate the verdict of the court when they are of such importance as to invalidate the vote. But there is a question, what are these high-ranking ceremonies? can be used Various criteria to identify these principles. However, the criterion of effective criminal procedure is more consistent with the current law and the former laws, while the criterion of the basic principles of the proceedings is more in line with the objectives of the criminal procedure.Key words: Principles of procedure, procedural procedures, Principles with high degree of importance, effective criminal procedure

Inflation affects fulfillment of financial obligations or non-financial contracts with financial effects such as marriage portion in marriage contract. Inflation renders fulfillment of obligations sometimes impossible or delayed and sometimes with great distress and constriction. Solutions must be devised in such conditions for just interpretation and execution of contract and prevention of abuse of right by the obligee as abuse of right is prohibited (Principle 40 of the Constitution law and Doctrine of LA ZARAR). Means such as cancellation of contract by the obligor using option of impossibility of submission of consideration, granting just deadline to the obligee, adjustment of contract, claim of delay damages or day price in delayed monetary obligations can help balancing between the parties' rights. However, it must be taken into account that making contractual conditions just needs to be in compliance with valid legal principles. Also, a solution for a legal issue is not necessarily similar to the other one due to the special relativity of humanities in general and law in particular and the fact that justice is a relative, flexible and fragile concept.

Structural Fields Of Judicial Crimes In Judges Of IranAbstractThe commission of judicial crimes by judges expresses the existence of defects in the judiciary and the personality of the judge. By dividing these objections into structural and individual, it seems that the impact of structural factors on the occurrence of such types of crime is more than individual factors. The structural elements are intended to cover a wide range of issues related to employment, training, pay and benefits, and how to manage the judiciary. In this research, in addition to the documentary method, by conducting qualitative interviews and conducting questionnaires from 130 judges of the judiciary, the structural contexts of the crimes committed by judges of Iran were comprehensively and objectively analyzed and criticized. During that time, suggestions will be submitted. Based on this, proper selection and election, useful training, essential in-service training, strengthening of judicial independence, the preservation of elites and qualified judges, increasing job attractiveness, along with transparency and accountability of the judiciary, are effective in maximum decrease of crimes in judges of Iran.Keywords: Judicial crime , Judicial corruption , White collar offender , Structure

Agency is subrogation and based on the majority of Shi'a jurisprudents and Iranian civil law an irrevocable agency is a kind of agency in which the agent's agency or the failure to dismiss him as a condition for the outcome of the contract is required. Today, irrevocable agency has become more prominent among traders than what it deserves and the trade conventions of the past decade have considered the irrevocable agency as a contract in which a person (the client) through obtaining the cost of his financial rights and signing the document gives that property or right to another person (agent) and cannot have any claim over that property or right. However, the condition of the agency or not being dismissed during necessary agreement does not change the nature of the agency and does not result in the change of the nature of agency from permission and subrogation to an eternal phenomenon. With such a condition, the client cannot dismiss the agent and in other sentences the permissible contracts, such as its dissolution due to the death and insanity of both sides, will not be influential. The present article aims at highlighting the weak points of an irrevocable agency and presenting a new pattern capable of replacing with it. The proposed template is a "transfer of sale right contract'' which is qualified enough to compete with death and insanity. ''Right of sale" as one of the components of property right has the necessary capabilities to replace the permission and representation. The focus of the text is on the fact that this capability should be proved taking into account the existing legal capacity so that any possible shortcomings can be solved through legislator's intervention.

This article first reviews the concept as well as the elements of participation in the process of restorative justice, and emphasizes the importance of the presence of all parties including victims, perpetrators, and the local communities, in conflict resolution in transitional society. The article also studies the impact of participation in achieving the major goals of the transitional society including national reconciliation and peaceful coexistence. The main question of the article is whether the multi-party participation in the process of the restorative justice has an impact on the realization of the goals of the transitional society. This article argues that the participation of all parties in a transitional society, as victim, perpetrator, or local community has a great deal of impact in the achievement of these goals, and it provides for both the protection of victims and rehabilitation of the perpetrators and it provides for both the protection of victims and rehabilitation of the perpetrators.

The individualization of custodial arrangements, such as the individualization of punishment, means the imposition and enforcement of criminal penalties commensurate with the nature of the offense or the characteristics of the offender as predicted in international human rights instruments in the international arena. The issue of criminal service contracts is a human protected by the principle of innocence and as a defendant and not a convicted person in the case, and therefore observing his dignity and his particular situation in issuing this sentence is more than the personalization of punishment and respect for the offender who is charged He proved to be important. Nevertheless, this part of the judicial decisions for the accused, in spite of the individualization of punishments, is less relevant to legal texts.The foundations for the individualization of custodial contracts are found in various theories of criminology and the legal principles enshrined in international documents and various regulations. Also, how to apply this, namely, proportionality or inappropriateness in the determination of general supply arrangements and the appointment of unnecessary arrest warrants in a specific sense, has explicit criteria in international documents, which necessitates these criteria as well as the degree of alignment of the Iranian legislator with that study And existing regulatory gaps

One of the main criteria of the democratic system is guaranteeing the rights and freedoms of the community. This subject will be done through the rule of law towards the organizations and authorities responsible for public affair. Judicial rewiew as one of the tools of the rule of law, in order to enforce citizens' rights, reduces government power. The purpose of judicial supervision is the handling of complaints and petition by people from executive agencies. Islamic development Organization as one of the Revolotionary institutions, this can not be excluded for the power of public authority.In the present paper, using descriptive-analytic research method, this question has been raise: What are the problems of judicial supervision over revolutionary institutions with emphasis on Islamic Development Organization? In response to this question, the Judicial supervision on the Islamic development organization The Administrative court and the public Courts have been discussed in two ways and this is the The judicial review on this organization is subject to limitations. The dichotomy of the legal personality of this organization needs to be explained; because it has causesed some problems in the administrative law system and judicial review of the organization.

If person owe to another with different reason and pay sum to paying off his debt; the article 282 civil law authorize to him for choosing that for which debt is this payment. In order to entitle the debtor for this selection; some conditions are needed; among the most momentous of these conditions is the amount of payment and debt. In this regard there is a dubious assumption that shows there is conflict in some assumptions with article 277 that seems according to legislative supportive. Approach in article 282 and interpretation in favor of the debtor; all qualities shall be covered by the above article. Regarding the time interval that debtor has authority to exercise his above right different approaches is stated. In one hand existence of proofs in article 282 on the basis of deviate from the chosen method in French law and attention to jurisprudential comment in regarding of debtor’s option.In the other hand existence some theories base on staying the debtor’s right at the time of quarrel. It is all enlightening that debtor’s option in selecting one of the several debts in article 282 is absolute and conditioning both time of debt settlement and litigation time.