نشریه مطالعات منافع ملی
پیاپی 18 (زمستان 1398)

  In his works and views, Shariati emphasizes identity, moral and religious perceptions for the life in this world. In the age of globalization, religion and religion have taken on new components. Indeed, the lifestyle of the infor m a t i o n age has emerged a new religion. Shariati offers identity, moral and rel i g i o us implications for his life in his works and views. For this reason, given that the Muslim world, including Iran, has been affected by the widespread crises of globalization and the media, Reflections on Shariati's arraignment can address some of these social and ethical challenges.  As a result, in rec e n t decades, Shariati's specific concepts and beliefs about selflessness, com m i t ted democracy, equality, justice, meaningful religion, individualism, and responsibility have all increased greatly. Shariati's attitude can help us in this regard. At the heart of Shariati's works of modernity and our historical tra d i t ion are two epistemological systems that cannot be reduced to one. One of the most important aspects of Shariati's reflection on the impact of their th ou g hts on Islamic movements in particular is the Gulen intellectual-social m o v e ment in Turkey. It is important because the Gulen movement has cre a te d specific socio-political influences in Turkey in recent decades.These effect t s c an be examined in aspects such as social democracy, equality and justice in society, committed and directed democracy, Sufi Islam, indigenous and r e i gious identity.

 Iran's foreign policy strategy towards Iraq after the fall of Saddam has been influenced by various factors, including geography, religion, economy and axis of resistance. Given the US occupation of Iraq, the decline of established government and the army, the particular attitude of the regional countries gradually led to an increase in Iran's regional and global influence in the new Iraq. After the fall of Saddam, Iran's foreign policy in Iraq, on the one hand, shaped security in Iraq, because after Saddam and the fall of the Ba'athist army, the security crisis spread in Iraq. Iran has played a key role in shaping Iraq's new security, including hardware and software security. But on the other hand, the involvement of other regional countries, such as Saudi Arabia, has led to new security crises in Iraq. In fact, Iran's policy in Iraq has had paradoxical effects on national security. As the economic dimension and economic growth and the decline of extremist groups such as ISIS has had positive and capacity-building effects, but in other dimensions such as the support of Iran's regional rivals for the insurgency in Iraq, the survival of extremist groups, authority of the central government have been challenged

 Legitimacy has been one of the central concepts of politics throughout history. Indicators of political legitimacy are shaped by temporal and spatial elements.  As in the past, traditional components were considered the most important element of legitimacy of governments and rulers. The main question in this paper is the effects of globalization on the concept and indicators of legitimacy. In response, it can be said that in the age of globalization, elements such as day-to-day economic functioning, lifestyle, and environmental efficiency are central elements of state authority. By explaining that globalization has transformed political and social life in all its dimensions. As life in the age of globalization has become more meaningful with pleasure, prosperity, life world, and so on.  In fact, it is imperative that managers and governments in the age of media hegemony maintain and enhance their governance and political power, favorable governance, globalization, their work with global norms, the welfare and enjoyment, and social democracy.

 For the past two decades, the main focus of US foreign policy has shifted to terrorism and fundamentalism. Although Russia's foreign policy has been more involved in its peripheral affairs, one of Russia's concerns has been the growing risk of extremism in those areas.  The main question is: what are the most important aspects of the similarity and difference between US and Russian foreign policy strategies in the fight against terrorism and fundamentalism? It seems the structural realist approach based on the elimination of threats, the provision of relative benefits from the global similarity, containment of terrorism and the use of smart power by the United States in comparison with limited military operations and regional pragmatism by Russia are the most important aspects of strategic differences. The political and security of the United States and Russia is opposed to terrorism and fundamentalism. Accordingly, it is imperative that both countries consider emerging non-governmental actors a security threat.

The importance of development has doubled since the end of World War II. The title, which came to be recognized as an independent concept in the post-war space, has already been discussed in the context of development, but in its general sense it means reaching the level of industrialized nations. In this sense, development meant primarily economic growth, which also increased over time as mechanization, industrialization and economic growth and modernization in the political and social dimensions. With the rapidly growing political, economic, and social development in Europe and the United States, scholars have begun to think of other options. In this study, political crises and their relation to political development have been studied in a library manner and it has been concluded that: political crises and underdevelopment create mutually crises. Political crises have a negative impact on the political development process and pose major challenges for the political system and its citizens. Also, political corruption will undermine citizens' confidence in the system and will undermine the legitimacy of the political system.

Iran-US relations have undergone many developments during the Islamic Republic of Iran. However, America's central policy has been regime change or metamorphosis in Iran's behavior. The United States has adopted various patterns and behaviors to achieve these macro goals. The main purpose of this study was to examine the patterns of Obama's foreign policy with Iran and its impact on the realization of US national interests. The most important goals of changing the Obama era approach toward Iran include multilateralism toward Iran, efforts to isolate Iran, diplomacy and negotiation with Iran, and ultimately a nuclear agreement. In fact, the Obama administration has transformed America's attitude toward Iran, including abandoning military aggression, creating economic incentives, engaging in direct dialogue with Iran, trying to persuade Iran's public opinion and to serve American national interests in the world, including the Middle East. Naturally, this transformation has served the American national interest in security, politics, and global cooperation, but the interests of governments and extremist groups within the US, the region, and the Zionist regime have been challenged by this Obama-led strategy of dialogue.

What is in the minds of today's thinkers and sociologists are family issues. Because the family as the most important human center, a key element in the formation, development and success of a society and nation، the prosperity of any society depends on the fortunes of its families. It has to strive for prosperity as much as possible. It is possible to fully identify the foundations and factors that strengthen family foundations. Many factors affect the consolidation of family foundations, the most important of these factors: Faith and virtue, love and affection, family roles and duties, cooperation and understanding between member, justice, good ethics, proper management and respect for courtesy, trust, and we will pay tribute to the members of the family. Identifying factors that weaken family foundations and ways to prevent it will help us achieve the transcendent goals of the family. Identifying factors that weaken family foundations and ways to prevent it will help us achieve the transcendent goals of the family.