نشریه فلسفه تربیت
سال چهارم شماره 2 (پیاپی 7، پاییز و زمستان 1398)

The present article has been written with the aim of analyzing and criticizing the components of educational justice in the discourses after the Islamic Revolution with emphasis on the discourse of ideological and constructive. For this purpose, some of the direct statement and some governmental and educational texts and approvals in the two mentioned periods have been studied and criticized by Norman Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis method. As can be seen from the analysis and interpretation of the texts, these discourses, although somewhat different in terms of educational justice, political and value positions, but in terms of textual and hyper-textual analysis, act more on the need and in the dimension of justice. Lack of budget, maintaining relations of hierarchical order, centralism, ambiguity and contradiction in opinion and practice, weakness in functionalist use of religion along with other ideas, internal and external unrest, limited internal and external interactions, conservatism, dominance and superiority of intellectual and value positions of the upper echelons of the system and as the most important factor and obstacle compared to other cases, including the most significant internal constraints and external barriers in providing the requirements for educational justice, especially at the qualitative level and it shows the inconsistency of the goals and programs proposed with the real relations and goals of the government. Consequently, If, in terms of motivation and cognition, there is no change in the intellectual positions of the ruling group as a source of authority and policy at all levels, change at other levels will not be possible as requirements for the effective realization of educational justice, especially at the qualitative level.

The main purpose of this paper is to explain the epistemological foundations of the Paideia project and its critique. Philosophical foundations, psychological foundations, sociological foundations, and historical foundations are considered as the basic foundations of education, especially in the field of curriculum, and the epistemological basis can be analyzed in the context of philosophical foundations... In this article, Adler's epistemological perspective on the twentieth century is examined, and the connection between this theory and his proposed curriculum, Paideia, is explained. The research method in the present article is descriptive-analytical and critique based on contemporary perspectives. According to the findings of the present article, there is a coherent relationship between the levels of good for the mind and the forms of knowledge that are presented in Adler's epistemological perspective and the levels of learning in his proposed curriculum. However, critiques based on contemporary views can be made on his epistemological perspective. Adler did not pay attention to tacit knowledge. Secondly, he did not refer to the point of science in the discussion of "universality" and "stability" and therefore situated in challenge of "the dynamics of science. Third, he did not develop the skills proposed in the Paideia curriculum based on the epistemological form of "knowing how".

In this paper, teacher education discourse has been analyzed in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Research assumes the governance discourses that have been articulated after the Islamic revolution, have defined teachers' semantic systems that have placed the political, economic, and social position of teachers in power structures. These semantic systems include a central signifier for teacher education discourse that other signs being articulated around it. The research questions are: what have been the central signs of teacher education in the governance discourse formed after the Islamic Revolution? And what were the backgrounds of teacher education discourses after the Islamic Revolution? This research is based on Laclau and Mouffe's discourse theory mode through document mining. According findings of the research, the central sign of teacher education in the governance discourses after the Islamic revolution of Iran are: Revolutionary teacher training, teacher training as a government agent, political development of teacher, fundamental reform in teacher education, teacher education as a theoretical and practical model according to the Islamic standard system. The wide discourse of the Islamic Revolution has had a lasting impact on the process of teacher education. Also after drafting the Fundamental Reform Document of Education (FRDE) and the Document of Teacher Education and the Provision of Human Resources in the Formal and Public Education Subsystem, teacher education has been viewed as a strategic position in the education system with a long-term and forward-looking approach.

The present study is an attempt to fill the gap between educational theory and practice, taking into account the Islamic perspective on education, which is based on the destruction of the concept of martyrdom (Shahadah). In this regard, by emphasizing the role of the original factor in Islamic education, the Prophet has been considered as a perfect manifestation of human beings and witnessed the implementation of original theories and the main mediator between theory and practice in education. Thus, the transition from theory to educational practice is explained by the basic principle that approaching the Prophet is a criterion for approaching the field of action and an objective manifestation of the theory of education, and consequently, distancing oneself from this educational criterion is a sign of the separation between theory and educational practice. Therefore, according to the Prophet's practical life in the history of Islam, transition in terms of educational practice has been introduced in three levels or general phases, including rational, emotional and behavioral levels by introducing twelve basic components.

Educational approaches in childhood have been very varient. One of the popular child education approaches in the world and our country is Montessori approach. This paper aims at examining and criticizing it from philosophical view. At first part, we attempt to inference the philosophical presuppositions. Some of these philosophical components of this approach are: holistic view of child, child as social individual, attention to child inclinations, accepting child spontaneous motive for learning, proposing triple concept of freedom-responsibility - rule, concentrating on skills and instruments. At the second step we criticized these components from Islamic view of action. Some components like overestimating individuality of child, concentrating on instruments and underestimating child imagination are the most important critiques of this approach. On the other hand, some items like attention to child inclinations and balance attention to freedom and responsibility are advantages of this approach.

The main purpose of this research is to explore the methodological critique of Narvaez's integrated approach to moral education. For this purpose, First, based on a certain pattern of methodological requirements, the integration of strategies was considered. Then based on this pattern, goal, the process of choosing the approaches to the origin, the level and type of integration, structure and meanings of the terms used in the Narvaez approach and the approaches of the source; and the existence Or the lack of meta-language in the Narvaez approach has been evaluated and criticized. The results indicate that, since the structure of the source approaches is intrinsically contradictory, and Narvaez did not attempt to discover or fabricate a meta-language or a common language, only the terms of the two approaches are placed horizontally or horizontally. it seems that, unlike his pleadings, In practice, the combination has not been made. In addition, the study of the content and meanings of the terms used in Narvaez's perspective and the approaches to the source show that these terms actually provided the same approach of character education or, At least, presented another version of the approach of character education. Thus, in terms of structure, the combination provided by Narvaez is challenged with serious challenge and is eclecticism.