نشریه حکمت اسرا
سال یازدهم شماره 2 (پیاپی 34، پاییز و زمستان 1398)

The scientific authority of the Holy Quran, meaning a significant impact on political science, is one of the important issues and requires many processes that rely on the theory of religious science. Ayatollah Javadi's theory of religious science with unique features is the most appropriate theoretical framework for the scientific authority of the Qur'an in the sciences - natural and human -. (Hypothesis) (Method) with the aim of introducing the appropriate framework and its application for scientific authority (purpose), comprehensive explanation of the theory in six stages and how to apply it in the scientific authority of the Holy Quran, is the most important achievement of this research. Concepts such as science, reason, religion, and the method of enforcement, signature, and inference are subtracted from general principles, and how they are realized in the political sciences are illustrated (findings).

Explaining domination and liberation in Islamic wisdom by emphasizing the thought of Ayatollah Javadi is the main issue of the article. The present article explains the above problem with a documentary method and a dialectical approach. Dominance refers to the domination of rationality, a tool that, although it first appeared in the modern world with signs such as the meaninglessness of life, alienation, objectivity, and mass culture, has now permeated all human societies and is considered a problem of humanity. According to Islamic wisdom, the roots of domination and liberation must be sought in the dialectic of nature. He also pursued the ways out of domination in the interaction of reason and narration in the epistemological dimension and social construction of reality based on the interaction and balance of nature and nature and the interaction of reason and narration. From this perspective, domination arises from social structures based on a barbaric nature, and liberation is achieved if social structures are reconstructed under the balance of nature.

One of the most important and challenging issues is the knowledge of wisdom, quality and the existence of the soul. Most rational theologians and theologians defend the abstraction of the soul by relying on rational and narrative arguments, while most theologians of the narrative and sectarian school emphasize the physicality of the soul by emphasizing the narrative arguments. Given this contrast, especially in the narrated arguments, the author decided to evaluate the narrated arguments of the issue independently in order to clarify the philosophers' claim that the reason for the abstraction of the soul is not limited to the rational arguments and the support and implication of the narrated arguments on Is celibacy correct or not? Therefore, the purpose of this research is, firstly, to explain the narrated evidences of selflessness in a coherent and independent way in the form of a research, and secondly, to evaluate these evidences whether they imply selflessness or not? For this purpose, Ayatollah Javadi Amoli, a contemporary scholar and commentator, has been discussed. By researching the libraries of narrated evidences that indicate the celibacy of the soul from the point of view of Ayatollah Javadi Amoli, the author has extracted and analyzed them. In this article, it will be clear that most of the narrated evidences of the sages, especially Ayatollah Javadi Amoli, indicate the abstraction of the soul.

How the findings of the mind are realized is one of the fundamental issues of epistemology. In the philosophy of Sadr al-Muta'allehin, the realism of the mind is explained in two ways: the essential correspondence between mental existence and external existence and the adaptation of the worlds. On the other hand, due to Sadra's various interpretations of nature, commentators on Sadra's wisdom, including Mesbah Yazdi and Javadi Amoli, have discussed the nature and type of its relationship with existence.Therefore, considering the role of nature and essential concepts in the fact of showing the mind and the criterion of nature for cognition in Sadra's wisdom, the issue of realizing mental existence is also affected by what nature is and the type of its relationship with existence. Now, the main issue of the present study is that based on the type of relationship between nature and existence, in the view of Professor Javadi Amoli and Mesbah Yazdi, based on the originality of existence, the essential conformity of mind and object is possible?After reviewing in the present article by descriptive-analytical method, it was concluded that in the view of Mesbah Yazdi and Javadi Amoli, the nature of mental emergence and the place of nature is only in the mind and there is no research outside, hence the nature Mental refers only to external reality, so the objective correspondence between mental and external nature does not make sense, and in order to prove the reality of mental imaginations, another expression must be provided.

As a consistent philosophical mechanism, transcendental philosophy is celebrated. It has disclosed a new perspective through passing the philosophy of Masha and Eshragh in close cooperation with mysticism and intuition for transcendental philosophy and knowledge seekers.Therefore, it is so amazing for its philosophical followers to observe serious and acute contradictions in philosophical theories of this philosophy owner.Distinct theories of Sadr-Al-Moteallehin in important subjects such as principality of existence and credit of nature could be considered as the indication.The source of conflict is noticeable in the great philosopher's works.This research is going to answer the above inquiry and solve current contradictions through studying Mulla Sandra's expressions relating to the principality of existence and the credit of nature.

Ibn Sina's words refer to an argument for the necessity of prophecy that neither he nor other scholars and theologians have fully interpreted. This argument is based on: For the existence of the Prophet as a perfect human being. Since Ibn Sina has referred to the principle of argument and has brought all its principles and preconditions in his works, it can be attributed to him and according to the preconditions used in this argument, it can be argued on He called the necessity of prophecy by means of the transcendental (or: subordinate or: parasitic) nature of natural beings (or: the universe), or by the ultimate essence of the existence of the prophet, or by the occurrence of evil. In this argument, the existence of evil has become a fulcrum for proving the necessity of prophecy, and thus what has often been considered a challenge to religiosity has been used as an opportunity. According to the Qur'anic evidence and the narration of the evidence based on this argument, it can be considered inspired by Islamic teachings. In this article, we tried to interpret this argument rationally and analyze its principles.