مجله حقوقی دادگستری
پیاپی 116 (زمستان 1400)

In principle, the effectiveness of conciliation provisions depends on a set of factors other than the will of the parties, such as the will of the legislator and the role of the judge. According to Article 10 of the Civil Code, the parties have full freedom of agreement, but this freedom is not absolute, and the supposed legal plans will change the structure of the contract.Now the question arises to what extent the legislator can play a role in the development and restriction of contractual freedom, given the economic, social, welfare and development needs by benefiting from special laws? And to what extent do law, custom and sharia prefer the public interest in preferring the necessities and pursuing public interests arising from the conflict of personal and public interest?To explain this important point in this article, coercion in the contracting board is divided into two types of elementary and structural coercion, and these results obtained by induction in the opinions of courts, scientific sources and judicial procedures indicate that: First, the courts force the parties to deviate from the conciliation results to a minimum or maximum, and the public interest is emphasized in the issuance of judgments as well as in judicial procedures. Secondly, the cases mentioned in the paragraphs of Article 190 of the Civil Code imply the obligation of elements to the extent that in the dominant aspect, in all agreements, they are present as a necessity in the composition and are irrevocable, but on the contrary, due to the structure of contracts. Certain special parties are required to comply with the rules arising from the requirements and restrictions that have arisen in the context of coercion arising from the elements and will require them to make the desired changes to elements of the contract.

Human security means the conditions under which the vital core of human life is protected. In this view, although the government has an important role to provide security, it should be seen as a means to provide it, not a matter or a source of security.This doctrine in the broadest sense means freedom from need and freedom from fear and living with dignity, since there's no accepted definition of it, it can be divided into minimalist and maximalist schools.The purpose of this article is to examine the duties and authority of NAJA with an emphasis on the minimalist of human security,which believes that lasting stability isn't achieved ,unless people are protected against violent threats to their rights,security or lives.Regarding the mentioned issues, the present study aims to answer the question"What are the responsibilities of the IRI police in achieving personal,political and social security?"It has been written with a descriptive-analytical approach,using the library method. According to the research 'findings, based on law, establishing order and security, providing public and personal comfort is one of the main missions of NAJA. Hence, the threats posed in the security components based on freedom from fear, directly, indirectly , follow its duties .It should be noted that the performance of police in achieving these security areas, due, is not satisfactory and goes far from the Philosophy of Existence of NAJA and the goals of human security, which is to maintain the security of human and human dignity.The change in the duties and powers of NAJA isn't a matter of choice,it's an inevitable necessity,That the most important of it’s effects will be the guarantee and promotion of the citizenship rights, increasing the public trust in the police ,intensification of the community centered police,establishing more discipline and security and increasing the legitimacy and acceptability of the system.

A judgment issued by a foreign country has been recognized and enforced if originating court has jurisdiction for hear the matter. This jurisdiction has been evaluated on the base of rules of addressed country. The key question is what are the criteria for accepting the jurisdiction of a foreign court at the voting stage? Some countries have jurisdiction over a foreign court, such as a domestic court. Others, by limiting the scope of jurisdiction of a foreign court, accept the jurisdiction of a foreign court only on the basis of strict criteria.. In Iranian law, only the exclusive jurisdiction of the Iranian court is considered as an impediment for recognition of foreign judgments. The need to meet the legitimate expectations of private individuals and to provide predictability in cross-border relations requires that the jurisdiction of a foreign court be defined as in the 2019 Hague Convention and that litigants be assured of the condition of recognition in other countries before the trial begins. The lack of uniform jurisdiction rules among countries to recognize foreign court judgments undermines the efficiency and usefulness of international litigation and makes it impossible for free movement of judgments between countries. The need to meet the legitimate expectations of private individuals and to create predictability in cross-border relations requires that cases of jurisdiction of a foreign court be specified and that litigants ensure that this condition is met in other countries before a trial can begin.

The discourse of the criminal policy of the judiciary In Instructions non-governmental institutions interact with the judiciaryAbstractIn the Iranian criminal policy, the participation of public institutions in the field of crime prevention, compromise between the actors of criminal cases, protection of victims, rehabilitation of criminals and implementation of criminal justice responses have been mentioned to some extent. Despite, the participation of these institutions faces many challenges from different angles. Lack of clear legislative criminal policy regarding the participation of public institutions, skepticism among government institutions in order to interact with public institutions and use the capacity of these institutions to curb and respond to the criminal phenomenon, lack of public awareness of the capabilities of these institutions in the criminal justice is one of the most important challenges. Therefore, training judicial officials, interpreting laws to strengthen the participation of public institutions, preparing and drafting a comprehensive law to develop the use of the capacities of NGO s, and raising public awareness about these institutions are among the solutions and the " Instructions non-governmental institutions interact with the judiciary", which was approved to strengthen the participatory approach in the process of crime prevention and combating crime, can create an arena for strengthening the interaction of judicial institutions with NGO s. In this article, A) action-oriented and B) Reactive approaches to criminal policy in the Instructions are examined.

Moving from reality to ideal will be a step towards understanding why government oversight is not being achieved beyond the psychological and moral critique of public officials, avoiding abstract and non-historical thinking and inviting a paradigm shift in legal thought. In other words, the central question is, beyond the psychological and moral criticism of public officials, what is the missing link in the lack of proper oversight of government actions in Iranian public law? findings are Merely promoting principles and concepts and, consequently, enacting a wide range of laws and establishing oversight mechanisms, the idea of overseeing does not make reality, but Supervision of the actions of government within the framework of public law is a kind of social existence or a form of collective life that arises from the relations between powerful social actors in the context of history and the balance between these real social forces. The recent understanding follows the fundamental insight that our efforts to realize the idea of overseeing government actions in public law through promotion of public law concepts and regulatory practices, regardless of the historical underdevelopment of public law in Iran and considering the social realities and objective conditions of Iranian society and trying to change them, will not end.

Each party to the contract expects that in the event of termination, automatic cancellation or cancellation of the contract, the same exchange or compensation that it has transferred to the other party in the contract, to achieve the purpose of terminating the contract. But in many cases it happens that despite the existence and survival of the original property, it will not be possible to return it. In the event of automatic cancellation or cancellation of the contract before the property subject to the contract is transferred to the third party by the buyer (transferor), If there is a right of termination for the seller from the beginning of the contract and according to the contractual condition, the buyer does not have the right to transfer the property until the expiration of the seller's option. However, if the seller has a potential right of termination in the contract and the property is transferred to a third party before the right of termination is created, and also if the termination or termination of the contract occurs after the transfer of property to a third party, the same property is non-refundable. It is destructed in law. The fundamental question is to what extent the existence of a right of termination for the seller can limit the ownership of the buyer? if the property is transferred to a third party and the contract is terminated, the seller is considered a destructed, unless the condition is violated (explicit or implicit) and the buyer does not have the right to seize the option. However, in the case of a sale, the legislature presupposes that the right of termination contains the implicit obligation that the transaction must be ready to be returned to the original owner, and therefore prohibits seizure contrary to the option.

Legislative authorities have determined a referee called the Disciplinary Council of Construction Engineering Organization to investigate the guild violations committed by construction engineers. From the point of view of the principles of public law, the constitution as well as the views of the Guardians Council, judicial review on this council is necessary. However, the legislator has not specified any competent court as the reference of judicial review on the Disciplinary Council of Construction Engineering Organization. In the judiciary as well, pointing to the non-governmental nature of the Construction Engineering Organization, the Public Board of the Administrative Justice Court has not approved the competency of this court to investigate the decisions made by the Disciplinary Council of that Organization. In addition to, the Public Board of the Supreme Court did not consider the decisions of the Disciplinary Council of the Engineering System Organization to be subject to appeal in courts, citing the word "certainty" authorized in Article 24 of the Engineering System Law. Now the question is what is the legal solution to solve this legal and judicial challenge? Regarding the resulted condition, it is suggested for the Public Board of the Supreme Court to modify its already adopted approach to “the certainty of the decisions of this administrative tribunals” in the new decisions about the united practice; because this approach contradicts the religious, constitutional law, and the staute. Certainty of these rules refers to the certainty of administrative and executive procedure and cannot be generalized to judicial certainty. In the second step, as a long-term plan, the Administrative Justice Court should be recognized as a competent reference to investigate the complaints about the decisions of all the administrative tribunals. This procedure is more adapted to the concept of administrative proceeding. Therefore, with modification of the rules,

Balancing the relationship between The Full protection and Security Standard (FPS) and the public health is one of the oldest challenges within the body of the international investment laws; since the protection of public health, without regulating the host countries, leaves room for harm to foreign investment, and the strict protection of foreign investment, can lead to the losing the public and fundamental interests of the host country.Therefore, within the current paper, there is an attempt to examine the legal system that overrules these concerns within the body of the international investment laws.The question which remains is how can host countries maintain their public health whithout breach of the Full Protection and Security Standard, and Creating their international responsibilities.This study shows that, the international investment laws do not take a clear stance when it comes to regulating the relationship between public health, and the implementation of (FPS), and that they are in fact in some cases paradoxical and disorganize .For example, although the fight against Covid-19, as an example of public health through quarantine, restrictions and bans, Recognizes the right of sovereignty of the host country, it may also have an international responsibility for them.

Objection to the plaintiff's representative at the time of filing the petition is one of the objections that cause a dismissal order according to Articles 84 and 89 of Iranian Civil Procedure Act. This objection does not apply if the petition is filed by the principal, because the authority is a matter for the representative only. In addition, the effects of missing or losing a position during the trial are different from the absence of a position for the plaintiff's representative at the time of the lawsuit.In this article, while dealing with the concept of representation and some of its examples in the judicial procedure, the issue of lack of position and its effects in the Iranian civil proceedings are examined. The main question is what the objection of not holding the authority means and if this objection is found in the proceedings, what decision should the court make about it? There are several possible reasons for the illegality of the person claiming representation; In any case, the court must prevent the intervention of the person without representative in the proceedings by asserting this during the trial.

The Code of Criminal Procedure adopted in 1392 with subsequent amendments and additions, except for crimes under the jurisdiction of the Judicial Organization of the Armed Forces, preliminary investigation of crimes of persons under 15 years of age under the jurisdiction of juvenile court and preliminary investigation of crimes of persons aged 15 to 18 years Shamsi, with the exception of crimes against chastity, has considered the 7th and 8th degree ta'zir crimes under the jurisdiction of a branch of the city's Public and Revolutionary Prosecutor's Office as the Special Juvenile Court. However, according to Article 315 of this law, crimes subject to the jurisdiction of the First Criminal Court, as well as the Revolution, in cases that are tried by multiple judges, if committed by adults under the age of 18, a special juvenile criminal court will try them. ‌ شد. However, this law is ambiguous in terms of competent authorities for conducting preliminary investigations and prosecuting crimes under Article 302 committed by minors and adults under 15 years of age. The authors, in this article, based on the legal standards and general principles of criminal law, come to this conclusion. It was concluded that in the case of persons under the age of fifteen, if the person is a minor, the preliminary investigation and trial of public crimes or revolution covered by Article 302 of this law will be carried out by the juvenile court, but if the perpetrator is under the age of 15, the reference Preliminary investigation and trial, the criminal court is a special case for juvenile delinquency.

One of the issues that have received less attention in competition litigation cases in our legal system is the litigation costs problem. The Competition Council has several tasks under "the Act of the execution of the General Policies of Article 44 of the Constitution"(2007), which requires a great deal of expense to perform optimally. At present, these costs funded by the government. Although in the current state of the economy with considering other countries' approaches to financing these costs, it is better to have at least some of the funding required by the council from other sources (such as receiving fees from private applicants).This study investigates the experiences of the US, Canada, Japan, Turkey, Denmark, the UK, Swiss, Ireland, South Africa, and Hong Kong legal systems in providing competition litigation costs.This article, in an analytical way, examines the justification for collecting litigation costs. Using the experience of other legal systems, it proposes a method (along with suggesting some articles) for allocation of litigation costs in the Iranian competition law and merger control regime to introduce a basis for reforming the law and optimizing Iran's competition system.

litigants sometimes refer to own wrongdoing and expect the courts to rule in their favor. If such lawsuits or defenses are accepted, justice will not be done and a solution must be found to solve this legal problem. In this case roman maxim " Ex turpi causa non oritur action, ex dolo malo non oritur action " are cited in legal systems . The most important thing about that is the concept and scope of its application. Therefore, the concept and scope of this maxim was examined in some legal systems, especially common law system, and some instances of it were researched. It became clear that in most legal systems, this principle is considered a certain legal principle. This maxim cited in foreign law in three sections: contracts, civil liability, and trust. The meaning and rules of applying this maxim in foreign law are not very clear; However, legal principles and policies and methods have been proposed to apply it, and there are instances such as illegal transactions, bribe restoration, slayer rule, and the responsibility of the offending managers to company, Which sometimes was criticized and Has been set aside. This maxim have a moral basis and considered as a requirement of justice. However, in practice, in order to avoid its mechanical application, its application is at the discretion of the judge, and this is done with the balance of the importance of the wrong and the amount of damage, and with Considering such rules as prohibition of unjustified enrichment. Islamic jurisprudence and Iranian law like any other legal systems, has it inside. This maxim can also be considered in litigations, and as a procedural rule prevents the parties from invoking their violations and prohibits the hearing of lawsuits or defenses that documented with violations of the plaintiff or defendant

Conflict of interests is the set of circumstances that create the risk that one's decisions or professional actions in relation to a person who trusts him or her will be affected by personal interests. Conflict of interests is one of the concepts that is essential for proper understanding in any field, because a proper understanding of this concept and its contexts provides the way for its proper management. The main question of the present study is what are the dimensions and scope of the conflict of interest in private law? The authors believe that the constituent elements of conflict of interests is profit, conflict, judgment and relationship. The presence of these elements in the relationships of individuals irrespective of whether the relationship is public law or private law creates a conflict of interests. This study has shown that conflict of interests in private law can be achieved either in a trust-based relationship (such as a lawyer-client relationship) or in a relationship based on impartiality (such as litigation) and Conflict of interests are not conceivable in other relationships. In this study, some of the most important instances that may be confused with the discussion of conflict of interests have been highlighted. Understanding instances of conflict of interests is a prelude to the legal management of these conflicts to avoid their harmful effects or to compensate them. In this article, the legal management strategy of these conflicts and reform proposals for the Iranian legal system is explained.

The family is a social institution and a natural unit that we have witnessed significant changes in its definition, structure and function in recent decades. In many legal systems, the family is an ideological institution whose laws are enacted in the light of religious rulings; Laws that are typically authoritarian and the will of individuals to determine their relationships is limited and partial. However, because of the dominance of such rules, one should not ignore the individual areas of human life in the institution of the family and prescribe the violation of their most fundamental rights and freedoms. Fundamentalism is a phenomenon that seeks to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals in society at the judicial level, and the fundamentalization of family rights seeks to amend strict laws whose absolute application will result in nothing but crisis and turmoil in the family institution. It also violates the fundamental rights and freedoms of family members, indiscriminately and extensively. In this research, in a descriptive-analytical method, by reviewing and criticizing the views of proponents and opponents of constitutionalization of family rights and by presenting criteria in line with the Iranian legal system, we have designed and explained the theory of conditional constitutionality. Prevent the fundamental rights of family members and the fundamental values ​​of the family institution, and shine a light on the minds and consciences of our intellectual judges.