مجله راهبرد سیاسی
سال پنجم شماره 3 (پیاپی 18، پاییز 1400)

The US Missile Defense Plan Establishment Effects on Middle East as a vital energy region has been done with the aim to maintain and keep hegemony in the western hemisphere. So, US, using balance off-shore balance strategy and alliance and coalition with Middle East region actors seeks to I.R. Iran, as a potential regional hegemon, harness and control through the missile defense shield. In this respect, US in addition of creating missile defense shield in Turkey, has taken the actions to improve air defense capability of Persian Gulf Countries. Selling Patriot system to four Persian Gulf Arab countries, and sending "X-BAND" radars to and other air defense equipment to Zionist regime are some of US actions. So, this paper is supposed to apply "aggressive realism theory" to examine US Missile Defense Plan Establishment Effects on Middle East and Iran reactions against. The paper is to answer the question that what's the goal of US Missile Defense Plan Establishment on Middle East and how had effected the Iran's power. This paper examine this hypothesis: US missile defense shield is established to maintain and keep the US regional hegemony and harness and control of Iran's military and missile power in Middle East.

The United States has imposed unilateral sanctions on Iran since the 1970s, following the unilateral withdrawal from the nuclear deal, posing a serious threat to the health system and patients' rights in terms of access to essential medicines due to banking and economic sanctions. Is. Given the interim ruling of the International Court of Justice to reduce US sanctions against Iran, several legal challenges can be imagined. Therefore, the main question of the research is what legal challenges the US unilateral sanctions on patients' right to health have posed in the light of the temporary ruling of the International Court of Justice? In response to this is the research hypothesis that examines the legal challenges of unilateral US sanctions in the form of human rights challenges and the challenges of violating international law. Explanatory-causal research method is obtained by examining documents related to health in Iran Legal Challenge-Unilateral Sanction-Right to Health-Provisional Verdict- International Court of Justice

The present study seeks to make a comparative study of the opportunities & threats of Turkish & Chinese economic projects in Central Asia for Iran. Therefore, using the content analysis method & the theme matrix type by indirect observation & analysis of research texts as a purposeful sampling method is collected from existing texts & through thematic coding, themes of opportunities & threats of China's economic projects & Turkey was identified for Iran in Central Asia & finally compared & analyzed in terms of commonalities & differences. Findings showed that the common denominator of Turkish & Chinese economic projects in Central Asia for Iran in terms of opportunity is to increase Iran's geopolitical importance & expand Iran's relations with countries involved in these economic projects. In addition to, the difference between China & Turkey's economic plans in Central Asia for Iran, the emergence of tensions & the imbalance of interests between the countries involved in China's economic plan & the other hand the inconsistency of Iran & Turkey development policies in Central Asia & the weakening of Iran It is due to the pursuit of Occidentalism policies in the region by Turkey.

With the collapse of the Soviet Union and the demise of the bipolar system, there were important changes in the geopolitical map of the world, including the formation of the Central Asian region, which, according to Mackinder's theory, is the southern part of the Heartland. Due to the power vacuum after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the beginning of events such as September 11, 2000, it created an excuse for the presence of the West to fight terrorism and influence in Central Asia, and this region, which has a special geopolitical, geoeconomic, geostrategic and geocultural position, has a special position in the confrontation between the East and the West. East and West show off and confrontation of each regional and extra-regional power to achieve their own goals and interests, which has become a concern and security problem in this region. The influence of the West and the regional and extra-regional powers in Central Asia has ignited the show of power of Russia, which is recovering its previous power, and considers this issue to be a serious threat to the security of the region. This issue has become the beginning of a confrontation between old rivals and regional and extra-regional powers. This research seeks to answer the question that the confrontation between East and West in Central Asia will shape the future for this region. And in response to this question, the hypothesis that the conflict between East and West in Central Asia is not only a factor in security and peace building in this region, but also makes its conditions more difficult in the direction of security and creates a security problem for the countries of this region.

The purpose of this article is to examine the concept of freedom and its relationship with law in Kant's philosophy of ethics. In his philosophy of ethics, he uses freedom as the basis of moral reasoning and believes that when man has free will, then morality is real and the law of morality is valid for all human beings. According to him, freedom does not mean the possibility of doing whatever one wants, because a person who wants the freedom to do anything is in fact a slave to his low self. Authority becomes the source of action and its cause only when it is in accordance with the moral law.In the present study, we intend to use a descriptive method to examine the relationship between freedom and moral law from the perspective of Immanuel Kant. Kant wants to show that morality is not just an abstract and formal system, but something that can be achieved and that man is in a position to make it a reality. The issue that inevitably arises is the issue of freedom and the possibility of freedom for human beings.

The Middle East region is going through a period of revolutionary changes that challenge the foreign policy of the countries of this region. Despite these changes, the Islamic awakening and the revolution in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya have not been able to change some important aspects of the West Asian region. One of the most important ones that outlines the strategic horizon of West Asia is the rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia.The wave of popular protests in 2011 in support of democracy and opposition to the ruling regime known as Islamic awakening has created new concerns for Saudi Arabia and Iran that should be taken into account in the context of regional priorities. In this new environment, there are many opportunities and threats facing both the Islamic Republic of Iran and Saudi Arabia, while both countries are trying to marginalize their competitors by using their soft power components and elements. to drive Now, after several years of the events known as the Islamic awakening, it is possible to draw a clear picture of the efforts of both countries in the direction of using soft power, and in a comparative analysis of their performance,

The purpose of this article is to explain the relationship between the center-periphery gap and the tenth presidential election (2009) in Iran. To achieve this goal, first, the impact of social gaps on elections and electoral behavior is examined, then the understanding of how the center-periphery gap affects the tenth presidential election in Iran. The results show that the actions of previous governments, which caused a lack of attention to the lower classes of society, and in contrast to the actions of the Ahmadinejad government between2005 and2009, led to the formation of a social base for them in the lower classes of society. In the tenth presidential election, Ahmadinejad has faced rivals who enjoyed an urban social standing. These results also show that most of Ahmadinejad's votes are in the lower and peripheral areas of society, and the farther we go from the center to the periphery, the higher the percentage of Ahmadinejad's votes. The Impact of the Center-Periphery Gap on Elections and People's Electoral Behavior and Ahmadinejad's Victory The result of measures such as the social base surrounding Ahmadinejad's government, class-geopolitical dichotomy in elections, and government actions such as justice stocks, housing, and allocating development budgets to deprived provinces.

Analysis of the interaction between political texts and its audience, It is one of the most complex and at the same time fascinating cases and areas that can bring attitudes and views towards most of the commitments. Show agreements and what is done in the form of binding and non-binding documents. Based on the descriptive-analytical method, the author, after examining political discourses in terms of critical discourse analysis and revealing the relationship between text and ideology in the Borjam document, showed that no text or speech or writing is neutral. Rather, it depends on the particular situation. This may be completely conscious or unconscious, as well as intentional or unintentional. For this purpose, the researcher based on the Halliday model of fifty sentences(Sentences that have become the material and commentary in the Borjam document (Persian translation)) From Western political figures and fifty sentences from Iranian political figures, taken from Borjam document, Has used content analysis method based on linguistic indicators in this research And in the end, she has mentioned certainty and uncertainty in the sentences of Iranian politicians and Western politicians in the form of statistics, which indicates that she is almost certain .