نشریه علوم سیاسی
سال بیست و چهارم شماره 4 (پیاپی 96، زمستان 1400)

The aim of this study is to identify the role of government in establishing institutions of political sociability from the perspective of Nahj al-Balaghah and tries to examine the role of government in creating institutions of political sociability in order to shape the beliefs, awareness and political behaviors of people by referring to its teachings. In this regard, using the capacity of the basic theory method concepts, categories and propositions related to the subject, are extracted and classified and analyzed in three stages of open, axial and selective coding. The basis of this effort can be identified and formulated a significant volume of codes, concepts and main and sub-categories related to research questions in the form of three options: "attention to electoral institutions", "organizing non-governmental organizations" and "formation of regulatory bodies and Security »are categorized. Finally, by abstracting the category of "positive confrontation with political sociability" as a selective category, it became clear that in the light of the proper formation of institutions of political sociability and the constructive role of rulers in this field, the realization of desirable political sociability can be accelerated

The aim of the present study is to investigate the formation of "founded identity" and "constructed identity" in Salafism and political Islam. The research method is descriptive-analytical and it is hypothesized that Islamic currents have followed the process of revivalism with two different assumptions, namely finding identity and constructing it; Salafism represented the first group, and political Islam represented the second group. The results indicate that the Salafi movement followed the process of identity revival through: "constant reference to the text", "ignoring the accumulated knowledge of Muslims" and "emphasizing the appearance of texts"; In contrast, political Islam has sought to revive Muslim identity in innovative ways by emphasizing "interpretation of religious texts," "referring to another while differentiating with it," and "returning to everyday life."

Leading research tries to use a descriptive-analytical approach, and design a model of a combination of "freedom", "positive and negative peace", "peaceful justice" and "just peace", the conceptual relationship of peace in this combination in the thought and political behavior of Imam Ali. (AS) check. The main question is whether peace overlaps with the two concepts of justice and freedom in the thought and political behavior of Imam Ali (AS) and based on a religious structure or not? The results indicate that peace in the thought and political behavior of Imam Ali (AS) is an important and parallel concept and in line with the two concepts of justice and freedom. Peace-seeking in the political behavior of that Imam, in parallel with the creation and realization of the two values ​​of justice and freedom, has been accompanied by the consent of God and in the direction of human charity. What is accepted by Imam Ali (as) is "just peace" and not absolutely conciliatory justice; Because just peace promotes religious values ​​in a religious structure and society

The present study seeks to answer the question of what is the analytical ability of the institutional structural theory of international relations in how to explain and analyze Iran's activism in the two events of "nationalization of the oil industry" and "Barjam"? The hypothesis is that the reliance on this theory for its emphasis on strategic rationality and the consensus of the great powers led to the "August 28 coup" in 1943 and the "Trump's withdrawal from Burjam" in 2018. The research method is content analysis method; The results show that although the two experiences of "nationalization of the oil industry" and "Barjam" reflect the failed experiences of Iran's foreign relations with the great powers, but the future of national security is directly related to improving the theoretical capabilities of international relations between Iranian agents and diplomats. Ignoring the structural, institutional and process rules of international relations can create new security challenges. Historical facts show that it is possible to repeat these events and developments in the future, unless we have a more accurate understanding of the rules of structural action of actors in foreign relations

The purpose of this study is to investigate the normalization of relations with the Zionist regime and its security consequences for the Islamic Republic of Iran. The main question of the research is what are the effective factors in establishing and continuing the process of normalization of relations between the Zionist regime and the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf, and what consequences will the development of this process have on Iran's national security? The research hypothesis based on "theories of unity" in the paradigm of realism is that "international intervention", "intra-regional competition" and "internal developments" were three factors influencing the beginning of the process of normalization of relations with the Zionist regime; The evolution of this situation from "normalization" to "strategic alliance" can pave the way for creating insecurity at the political, economic and military levels of our country. Findings show that "structural weaknesses and artificial strength of the countries involved in this process", "increasing regional power in Iran" and "adoption of a balancing strategy by the United States" are the most important factors influencing this process that the Zionist regime and some countries The Persian Gulf, in the form of a "peripheral doctrine", seeks to reduce its vulnerability to these challenges by forging strategic alliances

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of the effective elements of the "political system", which is related to the field of "political ethics". The research method is descriptive-analytical. The results show that every political system faces factors and obstacles to success; Factors and obstacles that are related to the moral dimensions are the same moral factors as the efficiency of the system. Political ethics can be defined and implemented in such a way that by creating a kind of stable ethics in political actors, it causes: "predictability", "transparency" and "reliability" of the agents of the system; Identify policy priorities; Determine the rights of rights holders in this area and provide a precise and clear definition of their rights. These results are achieved by applying three elements in political ethics: "providing the characteristics of good governance", "using the knowledge of professional ethics in politics" and "reforming the ideas of political ethics". These three components have been proposed as effective components of political ethics and open a new window to the discussion of political ethics

The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of neighborhoodism in achieving the indicators of good governance in social councils of Mashhad neighborhoods. In this regard, the principles of "good governance" and "administrative decentralization" have been selected as theoretical foundations. In terms of methodology, part of the research has been done by referring to the available data and library resources, and the other part has been done by using the interview method. In conducting the interviews, individuals related to the social councils of Mashhad neighborhoods, including members of these councils and officials related to them, were the study community. Findings show that social councils of Mashhad neighborhoods are related to five indicators of good governance, namely: "participation", "effectiveness and efficiency", "accountability", "transparency" and "rule of law" and are effective in achieving those indicators. . However, in the current situation, the challenges of neighborhood councils in achieving these indicators are more than twice their opportunities

The aim of this study is to provide an objective and sociological understanding of the development of national cohesion in Iran using the sociological concepts of Durkheim (mechanical and organic correlation) and David Lockwood (social integration and system integration). Using these concepts, the present article tries to show that national social cohesion is not a natural and pre-existing thing, but an industrial thing that is built on the horizon of the future. In historical experience, we see social and state-building trends in the field of national cohesion. This process has dialectically contributed to the development of national cohesion. To move from this controversial process and establish a stable relationship between social and systemic integration, we need the convergence of the rules governing social and systemic integration