نشریه امنیت ملی
پیاپی 46 (زمستان 1401)

The present article has been compiled with the aim of identifying effective Intelligence and Security factors as one of the dimensions of government organizations' interaction in security crisis management and tries to identify Intelligence and Security components and indicators in this type of interaction using the theories of experts and scientists. This research is applied in terms of purpose and mixed in terms of method. The statistical population of this research is academic experts, experts, commanders and managers in the field of security, Police who have scientific and practical backgrounds. In the qualitative section, data were collected and analyzed through thematic analysis through interviews with 38 people. In the quantitative section, 46 people with a researcher-made questionnaire whose CVI, CVR and combined reliability were confirmed. Data were collected and analyzed in a three-level factor validation model in Smart PLS software. After thematic analysis of the transcripts of the interviews, 4 indicators were calculated for each of the components of the Supreme National Security Council, national security, security of the province and the city. In the analysis of quantitative data showed that the most important indicators in the components are: Use facilities to deal with threats, dealing with threats, anomalies and problems, Members' interaction with council decisions and Consult the council with elites and scientists. So Intelligence and Security components with counted indicators are effective on Security Crisis Management Interaction.

This article seeks to identify the boundaries of power from social influence and tries to answer the following questions by criticizing the existing definitions: Should power and social influence, as many writers, be considered as a single phenomenon or two phenomena? And what are the similarities and differences between the two? Can two different phenomena of power and influence be distinguished in reality? Or are these just two terms for naming a single phenomenon? If these two concepts are two separate phenomena, what do they have to do with each other? Is influence a form of power or, conversely, is power a form of influence?In order to answer these questions, the nature and sources of power and influence, the means of their application, the process of formation and scope of each, the sources of influence and the mechanism of formation and their differences and similarities with power are discussed. The conclusion is that, if we define power in the general sense as "the ability to influence another," there are different ways of influencing; One of them is power in a special sense (the ability to impose will on others) and the other is social influence. In this definition, influence is a form of power. But if we mean power in the specific sense of power, social influence is a phenomenon of the breadth of power, which is different from power in the sources and process of formation, means of action and flow.

The main field of this research is the use of scientific achievements with a specific structure in the detection of crimes, and the final goal is to design a strategic model for the scientific detection of drug crimes in order to answer the question, what is the strategic model for the scientific detection of drug crimes? This is an applied and developmental research that was carried out using a mixed approach in both quantitative and qualitative stages. The statistical population of the research in the qualitative phase is 10 experts in the fight against drugs and in the quantitative phase 100 experts, commanders, university professors and judges. The participants were randomly selected in the qualitative phase of the purposive sampling approach and in the quantitative phase. The tool for collecting research data in the qualitative phase was a semi-structured interview and in the quantitative phase, a researcher-made questionnaire. Friedman's test was used to determine priority. The findings of the research show that the design of a model for the scientific discovery of drug crimes is a necessity and the significant relationship between the specified dimensions and components was proven with a high coefficient. The final result of determining the pattern of scientific detection of drug crimes based on the research findings and the necessity of equipping and coordinating the activists fighting against drugs is the use of scientific methods that confirm the alignment of the dimensions, components and indicators used in the pattern with high significance.

"Security Dilemma" is considered a central concept among all neorealist theories. How a country interprets the "security dilemma" resulting from the actions of another country (ies) and what strategy and behavior it adopts based on that interpretation. Government decision-makers and policymakers interpret the security dilemma through three a priori logics (the Fatalist logic, the Mitigator logic, and the Transcender logic). By framing the concept of "security dilemma", this study seeks to answer the main question that the "strategies and behaviors of the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in various governments towards the "security dilemma" due to the military presence of the United States in the regions around Iran, How are they formed?"It hypothesizes that "the various governments of the Islamic Republic of Iran, by choosing one of three Fatalist, Mitigator and Transcender logics to interpret the 'security dilemma' resulting from the presence of the United States in the regions around Iran. Iran has chosen a specific type of foreign policy strategy and behavior:1)by Fatalist logic, maximizing the consolidation of components of power (including military power) and not giving up the missile program in exchange for some incentives. Has been pursued, because otherwise the survival of the system is threatened (such as the issue of Libya); 2)by Mitigator logic, policies such as de-escalation and the signing of agreements such as the JCPOA have been unsuccessful due to US cheating and concerns about relative gains

More than two decades of successful experience of the European Union and its member states. In the face of the problems and challenges ahead and the increase of its power by accumulating power in a transnational institution, it has acted as an important catalyst and incentive to direct other countries and world powers in shaping the process of regional convergence. However, the question is what is the reason for the success of some regions in converging and the futility of the efforts of some other regions in this field? In particular, why do West Asian countries fail to benefit from regional convergence? The research hypothesis is that the success of convergence in West Asia depends on a four-dimensional model that can fill all the gaps and provide the necessary grounds for the transition to convergence among regional actors. The mentioned production model includes all four areas of vision (belief), motivation, structure and environment of actors' actions and by distinguishing between the world of actor's cognition and the world of his motivations and personality traits - which are other psychological components such as feelings, experiences, emotions and .. Also seeks to shed light on both "human-centered" sources influencing human actor's actions, in parallel with the study of environmental and structural components.

The aim of this study; Investigating and counting the threats to the security environment of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The security environment can be considered as a geographical area in which threats and opportunities are created for a country. In the western and southwestern part of the country; That is, from the Khosravi border to the beginning of the Azadegan plain in Khuzestan province, it is the refuge of people who are of Iranian origin and have always been the propagandists of the original Islamic and Iranian values. The existence of this ethnicity has opportunities, capabilities, benefits and advantages, as well as harms, threats and harms, etc. in its womb. These threats include: mines used and other explosive traps left over from the war, smuggling of weapons and ammunition, the presence of transnational forces, the occurrence of some fires in the border strip, smuggling, etc. from these areas. Is. The research method is historical-qualitative (thematic analysis) and its statistical population includes primary documents and historical sources as well as interviews with knowledgeable people or information gatekeepers. The sampling method was purposeful. The results show: This context: It has requirements and opportunities that, if used and mobilized, can turn many threats into suffocating seeds, even turn them into opportunities. The enormous material, spiritual, media, and intellectual investment of the arrogant front, on the other hand, presupposes the possibility of the tendency of some weak and careless elements towards them.

The strategic futures studies in the homeland security must be able to manage of the rapid process and radical of environmental changes with features such as uncertainty, complexity, uncertainty and dynamicsIn the study, qualitative and qualitative methods (mixed methods) are used to realize the objectives of the research. In the qualitative part, based on the exact study of all external and internal documents and systematic literature review of strategic futures studies,dimensions and components, and sub-components of homeland security strategic futures studies. Cronbach Alpha and composite reliability of the research are equivalent to 0/782 and 0/791 respectively. The findings of the research show that the dimensions, components of strategic futures studies, homeland security in the viewpoints of the experts for the future of the homeland security of the Islamic Republic of Iran include as follow: Components of description, analyzing and explanation, including: universal trends, environment polarizing, benefits and power of universal actors, strategy and doctrine of actors and minatories, their power and objectives, political, economic, social, cultural trends, values, capacities, and national resources, belief and way of thinking peoples, way of thinking homeland security, principles and doctrine of homeland security, macro targets and politics of homeland security And Components of strategic decision-making, including: determining the territory, environment scaning, trend-researching, casual layeranalysis, analysis of key factors and drivers, identify weak signals of change, vision drawing, Key technologies, scenario-formulating, wildcards scenario, flexible and case strategy, backecasting and Strategic planning.