نشریه پژوهش های نقد ادبی و سبک شناسی
پیاپی 13 (پاییز 1392)

If we take a passing look at the written biographies in Safavid period, this will be clear correctly that the poets of this period had been able in poem criticism and everyone has somehow tried to criticize poems. This criticism caused a stylistic important feature in poem in this period. It is the vivid feature of dispute of poets with each other and poem criticism with poem that are the dominant features of this period. The poets of the Indian style have had dispute with each other more than any style in Persian poetry, because of this, analysis of them based on stylistics and literary criticism is very important. In this essay, poet's dispute of this style will be analyzed. Beside the classification of them, we will survey the main principles of this dispute formation.

Particularly important in the Azarbaijani style, repetition is an outstanding feature of the poems belonging to it. Repetition, utilized in diverse forms, has an important role in the artistry, highlighting and de-familiarization of the poems composed in that style. Moreover, as a professional and applied tool, it was enormously used for figures of speech and imagery. This article examines the role and applications of repetition in the Azarbaijani style of Persian poetry.

In this paper, according to Prop's theory, Ghesseye Shahre Sangestan has been analyzed. This poem is written by Mehdi Akhavan-Sale. The theory of morphology is used to analyze this story. At the beginning of this article storytelling in poetry is reviewed. Mehdi Akhavan-Saales is one of the greatest poets and storytellers in contemporary poetry. In this paper we refer to aspects of this story as a myth. After that, the story elements in this story are given. In the original discussion paper, Roles and characters have been studied. The results obtained from morphological studies. And there are Seventeen roles in the story. There are five characters in this story. The five characters are doing self-actions (Khishkari) in this story.

The story of Lion and rabbit in Masnavi is a creative rewrite of its main source, Kelile and Demne, is an amazing source for psychological analysis and because the mystical area is the tension field between the extreme opposites like good and evil, being and nothingness, form and meaning, they can show mental universe and psychology of science and they can strike a balance between opposites and between conscious and unconscious (outside and inside). This paper analyzes the story of "Lion and Rabbit" in Masnavi based on "analytical psychology" of Carl Gustav ung. According to the mystical interpretations that are essential for review of mystical works. In this paper because of its allegorical story and presence of animals, ancient patterns of Jung, besides special symbols of his psychology has been considered. The rabbit is the symbol of anima and adjutant, and the lion is the symbol of consciousness, and animals are the symbol of collective unconsciousness.

In this paper there has been an attempt to conduct an analysis on structure and narrative system of Shamloo's Paria tale so that by understanding movements and automatic actions in Paria's tale, first of all functions and sub-functions in the tale are enumerated, and then a great deal of attention is paid to events and sequence of automatic actions, combination and interchange of this automatic action. Besides, the amount of effect of every movement on narration will be discussed, firstly, to conclude that this tale of Shamloo has been based on nine functions and five sub-functions. Secondly, automatic actions of characters in the tale sometimes have no chronological order and no logical sequence of time, and based on its poetic texture, we are faced with several substitutions and replacements of sub-functions. Thirdly, some of these sub-functions have been narrated like narrative clauses, and some other can be implied using structure of tale or by identifying clues from other sub-functions.

"Golestan Sadi" is one of the comprehensive works in Persian Literature and has been translated in different languages such as French, Germany, English, and Arabic. Due to high significance of the book and getting the readers more familiar with this book, such research has been considered. One of the Arabic translations of this book is "Rozat Al Vard" by "Mohamma Al Forati". In spite of being familiar with Persian language, Forati has sometimes made errors in understanding and translating proverbs, metaphors and single words. As a result, he has failed to transfer the message of the source language into the target language. In this article we try to examine some parts of these errors. The procedures include dividing the errors into three parts of Proverbs, Metaphors, and Words. The basis of the article is to bring Persian phrases from Golestan Sadi text by "Soodi" description firstly and then Arabic text from "Rozat Al Vard" by "Mohammad Al Forati" with the necessary notes. At the end we also try to suggest the correct phrases instead of those phrases that are wrong.

Sanai's odes are compare able not only to his own distinguished works like "Hadighat_ol Haghigheh" but also to other outstanding Persian literary works regarding literary value. The variety of content that exists in Sanai's odes is linked to the poet's multifaceted character and the legends about him. The subjects dealt with in Sanai's odes are various and dont seem unique. For this, the audience may wonder how issues like piety, mysticism, politics, social science and sometimes satire and lampoon are gathered together. Therefore, for the importance of subjects and content of the odes an independent study was necessary. In this study, we analyze the ode's contents and categorize the subjects and also investigate the reason for such variety.

One of the main elements in methodology of poetry is the conversational structure of the poem, which is vocal and wording that the conversation is based upon. In this essay this is our intention to study the methodology of Nezami sKhosro and Shirin piece; one of the most important poetry pieces in Farsi literature. Based on above, the main subject in critiquing this piece of poetry is to understand the conversational infrastructure that Nezami has made use of, in order to enable us to structurally analyze his poem using formalism approach, or in other words; how Nezami could create such wonderful piece by deviating from everyday normal conversation to poetry conversational format and to do so how the clarification process is used for creation of Khosro and Shirin piece.