فهرست مطالب
فصلنامه ذهن
سال سیزدهم شماره 3 (پیاپی 51، پاییز 1391)
- بهای روی جلد: 60,000ريال
- تاریخ انتشار: 1391/08/16
- تعداد عناوین: 7
-
-
صفحه 31
-
صفحه 147
-
Page 5The present writing develops the foundations of knowledge from three categories (knowledge (mental form), knower, and the known (object of knowledge)) to four and introduces educator (as the fourth one). By educator, the external agent is meant which plays the main role in communicating knowledge. This writing proceeds in four lines: educator, one who is being educated, objects of education, and methods of education. And it employs the semantic methodology in the connotative fields; and, finally, comes to the conclusion that from among educators, the Holy Quran puts emphasis on God; and, from those who are being educated, it emphasizes man; and, though it mentions some other instances for both of them, the overview presented by the Holy Quran is based on Gods being an educator and mans being one who is being educated.Keywords: semantics of connotative fields, semantics of education, semantics of knowledge, educator, objects of education, methodologies of education
-
Page 31Apart from controversies between internalism and reliabilism in the general epistemology and if reliabilism is taken for granted- at least at the level of daily and conventional justification-, the present article assumes moral intuitions as reliable processes producing true beliefs more than false ones. Thus, in the beginning, the article discusses the nature of moral intuition and reliabilism; then, it claims that, as a reliable process, the assumption of moral intuition may play a justifying role at the daily and conventional level (and not at a philosophical level). In what follows, the article mentions problems in reliability of moral intuition and provides solutions for them. The present writing discusses the above problem on the basis of Goldmans reformed reading of reliabilism.Keywords: externalism, reliabilism, internalism, moral intuition, rational presentation
-
Page 55The present writing tries to provide a systemic picture of Suhrawardis epistemology. As for other Muslim philosophers, epistemology has not been the Suhrawardis main concern; it seems, however, that if we look for in his books and works, we may manage to infer an epistemological system. Thus, Suhrawardis epistemology, which has been founded with the help of illumination, is, by definition, a systemic one or, at least, a systemic explanation of it may be provided. In other words, his epistemic discussions consist of a demonstrative and defendable system having consistent foundations and parts which, in turn, fulfill his objectives and perform functions he has specified. When faced by host of intellectual problems, it may classify them and provide solutions for them. In this epistemology, foundations of knowledge (knower, knowledge, and the known object) have been exactly specified and similarity between them has been explained. Also, Suhrawardi has paid due attention to the main problems of epistemology such as quiddity of knowledge, possibility of knowledge, solving the problems of skepticism and relativism, criterion for knowledge, sources and tools of knowledge, kinds and levels of knowledge, the relation between subject and object, solving the problem of mental existence, limits of knowledge, possibility of evidence and its criterion, certainty and its ultimate limit, the impact of non-epistemic factors on knowledge, the process in which knowledge comes into existence. Also, in Suhrawardis epistemology, one may see that due attention has been paid to some minor or new matters or matters probably relevant to epistemology. As for such matters, we may mention truth and justification, definition and its conditions, possibility of mans knowledge of other minds, possibility of mans knowledge of God, implication. In various respects such as being methodological, having an end, inclusion, coherence, applicability and the like, Suhrawardis epistemological system is considered as a desired one, though it is open to critiques.Keywords: systemic, knowledge, epistemology, knowledge by presence, Illumination, Light, intuition, intellect, imagination, Idea, sense
-
Page 91In the present article, at least, two correlative objectives are searched for. At first, the author will try to present a contemporary reading, as a model, of the main approach adopted by the Peripatetic philosophical tradition concerning the relation between the soul and body; in other words, a reading which is more abstract than Sinean, Thomist, and Aristotelian ones. This model will be discussed under Principiality of Perfection- Based Union. The second objective searched for here is a comparison between capacities of this model on the one hand and those of union based on ontological reduction. In this article, the author has tried to show that both reductionist and perfection-based approaches may be classified under the idea of principiality of union; concerning questions of the existence of soul, however, reduction and elimination are two sides of the same coin. It seems, however, that the main and common problem with all versions of ontological reductionism- apart from those mentioned in this article under comparative study- is that the idea of reduction has been overshadowed by the idea of elimination and, consequently, the union resulted from reduction will be followed by denial of a part of what that intuitionally seems to be real which is a high cost.Keywords: soul, body, principiality of perfection, based union, ontological reductionism, physicalism
-
Page 117One of the most fundamental issues concerning epistemology of the transmitted evidence is that whether or not the transmitted evidence depends upon other sources [of knowledge]. Those who advocate dependence of the transmitted evidence who are called reductionists are of the opinion that the validity of transmitted evidence depends upon the proving argument. On the contrary, those who advocate independence who are called non- reductionists are of the opinion that justification for the transmitted evidence is an independent one. In the present article, while studying the most important arguments provided by each of the above two groups, the author will discuss the relations between these arguments and ideas presented by the scholars of the Principle of Jurisprudence. The methodology employed by the author in this article is an analytic-documentary one.Keywords: reductionism, non, reductionism, transmitted evidence, epistemology, justification
-
Page 147Though, as we know, Aquinas is influenced by Ibn Sina, he has been mostly introduced as an opponent of Ibn Rushd (Averrose). In the present article, the author has shown that in many cases Aquinas is influenced by Ibn Rushd and in most cases in which he is in conflict with Ibn Sina, he relies upon Ibn Rushds views. Aquinas rejects Ibn Sinas the rule of al- Wahid, doctrine of emanation, active intellect, and theory of knowledge; he has gone to reject these ideas, however, in the light of Ibn Rushds; and his oppositions to Ibn Sina is to some extent similar to Ibn Rushds opposition to Ibn Sina. It seems that Aquinas has adopted Ibn Rushds main views knowingly; he has introduced Ibn Rushd, however, in a way that it is as if Ibn Rushd opposes his own main views.Keywords: the rule of al Wahid, doctrine of emanation, material intellect, active intellect, knowledge
-
Page 165In this paper, we are going to compare the thesis of holism embedded in Kuhns philosophy of science and Quines epistemology. Both of these philosophers have emphasized philosophers after them a great deal. One of most crucial concepts in Kuhns philosophy is incommensurability which is widespread nowadays in philosophy of science. He defines it in three levels including observational, methodological and semantic. To do such a thing, Kuhn appeals to a kind of partial holism, i.e. at the level of paradigm. On the other hand, Quine holds a kind of epistemic and semantic holism which seems to have much affinity with Kuhns partial epistemic and semantic holism used in his incommensurability thesis. This paper aims, while introducing Quines holism in his Two Dogmas of Empricism and Kuhns incommensurability in his The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, to express such affinities.Keywords: semantic holism, epistemic holism, incommensurability, paradigm, Kuhn, Quine