پژوهش نامه انتقادی متون و برنامه های علوم انسانی
پیاپی 30 (بهار 1393)

In the last three decades after the Islamic Revolution of Iran، a wide variety of books have been written about the contemporaray literature of Iran in both prose and poetry form، each having its own specific characteristics. Among all these books “The Contemporary Literature of Iran- Prose” written by Mohammadreza Ruzbeh is different to some extent. However، the mentioned book is not far from some faults it comprises the proper samples and an extensive amount of contemporary proses within acceptable review and analysis of them، all gathered in a small volume. It should be also considered that this book has been selected as a refrence book of bachelor course of Persian literature. Therefore، it is of great importance including several benefites and points and can be regarded as a chosen training text in educational courses. In this article the stengnth and weakness aspects of this book has been investigated.

Selection of Tarikh e Beyhaqi with Ravanpoor description is one of successful books that the teachers and students of language and literatures field used it in bachelor term time. Importance of Tarikh e Beyhaqi and attention to this selective book and role of this selection to acquaint student with Tarikh e Beyhaqi، caused to writers express its advantage and strengths. They also evaluated its deficiency. And at the end they offered suggestion to be better its structure and content. This research in addition to attend to typographical errors and punctuation errors، and it tries to be explained ambiguities of this selection for its addressee. Also this research tries to mention the parts of Tarikh e Beyhaqi that it is essential to show logical process of collapse of Ghaznavian dynasty but selection lacks them.

This paper is provided whit the aim of review and critique of «comparative review of religion and mythology in Shahnameh of Ferdowsi، Khamseh of Nezami and Mantiq Al-Tayr of Attar» written by Dr. H. Zomorrodi professor at The University Of Tehran. The Results of this study، primarily is that the basis of the author in this book، is accepting an irrational and unscientific theory from some Western about religions and myths and their relationship with each other and how they are emerged، have been expressed. Second، Methods of author ''s research is not based on the scientific methods، because on whole of the book، in each part، the author first brings some contents of the myths of various nations and then by cutting verses of Shahnameh or Khamseh or Mantiq Al-Tayr inspires that those texts are affected by those myths and they are revealed. Third، is the author’s neglect in connection with the Ferdowsi، Nizami and Attar and their firm as a conscious belief in Islam and Islamic culture manifested that seen in their workd from place to place which is totally different with myths and theories are the so-called mythology. The results of the author ''s work is an attempt to show that there is a similarity between the great texts of Persian classical literature and the ideological view of Western Mythologists، and that they are nothing but Asatir Al-Avvalin.

The book BaCheragh-o-Ayene is second separated work of Shafiekadkaniaboutvarious aspectsof contemporary Persianpoetry; According tothe author، thisbookCompletes another his book: Advar-e- sher-e- Farsi. Thebook، is a collection ofLiterary history، literary criticism and comparative literature. This book was formed from five main sections، fourjoined،apartnamed final wordindex andresources. Inthisstudy، we haveexamined various aspects of thestructure and contentof this book including: Someprominentfeaturesand someits possibleshortcomings، such as title، itsshortcoming criteria and ambiguity ofcontemporary. The shortcomings،Iftheauthorremovethem،the book will also be useful. Finally، some caseshave beensuggested

The period beginning from the second half of the twentieth century to the present time، in some countries، has been named as the postmodern. This kind of naming caused the culture، art، knowledge، and the social reactions of this era to be often associated with the term postmodern. Hence، the literature of this period eminently has been associated with the adjective; postmodern too. Each of the critics and philosophers of the West have defined some characteristics for the literature of this period. The present paper، while considering some of these characteristics، analyzes the book Postmodernism in Literary Fiction of Iran written by Dr. Mansoureh Tadaion، and deals with ups and downs and the adequacy of the mentioned book.

The period beginning from the second half of the twentieth century to the present time، in some countries، has been named as the postmodern. This kind of naming caused the culture، art، knowledge، and the social reactions of this era to be often associated with the term postmodern. Hence، the literature of this period eminently has been associated with the adjective; postmodern too. Each of the critics and philosophers of the West have defined some characteristics for the literature of this period. The present paper، while considering some of these characteristics، analyzes the book Postmodernism in Literary Fiction of Iran written by Dr. Mansoureh Tadaion، and deals with ups and downs and the adequacy of the mentioned book.

Tending essay، in particular masters and students on MA and PH. D degree، in Iranian scientific society، it is an unavoidable to recognize necessarily edition methods within scientific standards. A work like Principle of Scientific – Scholarly Edition by Dr. Mahmoud Fotuhi، is a necessitous motion that response to this necessity. Moreover noticing sorts of standards and updated method، edition and compilation of this kind of books need idealistic scientific scrupulosity and precision، studying pioneer books in this subject and other necessaries. Fortunately most of this specifications is obvious in compiling this book. This paper is consequence of considering this work and recalling some editional lapses in the text which، by accepting by author، hoped to removed them in next publication to present a trim work for readers.