Comparative Analysis of Views on Urban Projects

Nowadays in the design and implementation of urban projects emphasis to gaining of intersectoral coordination and community participation. But attracting community participation seems difficult without approaching the people and officials opinions. The main object of this research is the examination of existence or lack of significant difference between people and officials opinions about urban projects prioritization. For this purpose, people’s viewpoints were collected through 424 coincidental samples and it has been compared with viewpoints of 46 related officials with “Healthy Cities Projects” in Rey city (As one of the projects that is a consideration at the international level) in field of activities prioritization. The statistical analysis was performed using two multivariate ANOVA and non-parametric test of Friedman and U-Mann-Whitney test in SPSS environment. The results indicate that in case of activities levels on “Healthy Cities Projects”, there is a significant difference between people's and officials viewpoints. But, in field of prioritization investigating vulnerable groups’ there isn’t a significant difference between viewpoints of people’s and officials. And in the field of urban issues to prioritize investigation also it requires additional discussion. In the end of article the solutions were proposed to better carry out the project.