Responsibility of the Judiciary in Returning the Proceeds from the Trust Funds to the Original Owners

Because sometimes the judicial process requires that one of the parties to the lawsuit deposit money under various headings such as bail, security deposit, etc. to the justice fund. During the trial, it is envisaged that these properties will be shown. The nature of these funds is trust and they are placed at the disposal of the judiciary as a deposit. Therefore, depositing them is defensible; because, firstly, it is in the direction of maintaining the conventional and respecting the interests of the original owners of these funds, which Article 612 of the Civil Code deems to be the trustee's duty, and secondly, according to Article 617, it prevents the trustee from taking possession of these funds; But according to Article 623, the interests of these funds are owned by their original owners. Therefore, it is necessary that when these funds are returned, their profits should also be returned to the owners. This is while this does not happen in practice, rather, some needs and necessities of the judicial system are solved from the profit of these funds. Therefore, the present research with a descriptive-analytical method aims to investigate the fate of the exhibits obtained from trust funds with the judiciary and to explain their ownership, but finally, according to Sharia standards and the principles of public and private law, no means were found for the legitimacy of the judiciary's seizure of these properties. But because on the one hand, t