نشریه پژوهش های ادبیات تطبیقی
سال پنجم شماره 4 (پیاپی 14، زمستان 1396)

Autobiographical narrative in which only a first-person audio and written, whow the author explains in his life. Made a contract with the reader, he recounts the facts of his life, or parts of it. But, the famous french writer Georges Perec and Nathalie Sarraute that the two are, in their books are narrated duet. Sarraute, in a book called Childhood, forced to use the first-person narrator's inner dialogue, dark spots and delusions that recounting every memory with its integrated. But Georges Perec, in his autobiography, apparently, from his childhood, the two narrations: first real and second, all of it is fiction. First, we think that in the second story the narrator does not have anything to do with child, But then we see that as an analogy of his life. In addition, both authors refer to the lies that are included in their story. This process is incompatible with the truth implicit contract. This article will provide a comparative analysis of the two works show an autobiography, which should in principle be monophony is why duet, what is the function of sound or narration second as metatext, and what's the role of imagination in the difficult process of recovery.

One of the components of research in comparative literature is to study intertextual relations. According to intertextuality approach, no text is self-sufficient. Weve been tried to examine the novel entitled ‘kill all of them’, written by Salim Bashi , with Michael Riffaterre ’s intertextual approach , and with the aim of finding a hidden meaning of the text and Riffaterre’s binary oppositions forms. Thus, Attar’s ‘Conference of the Birds’ was used in reading this novel. In fact, the study is about the application of a story narrated in the novel of Salim Bashi which is based on Attar's ‘Conference’ of the Birds. In this study, we analyze the text and the words interpretants for reading and finding the significance or the subtext meaning of the novel defining the transition from meaning to significance. The findings of the study confirmed the hypothesis that the presence of interpretants invokes intertext. The significance of the novel by Bashi is discovered with a contrast look to intertext. It seems that we can observe the significance Attar reversely. The entire novel is the contrast between the concepts of self-consciousness and faceless human.

The narrator is a fundamental concept in analyse of the narrative texts and Focalization as an interstitial element, from one side connecte to the story and the characters and from other sid connecte to the narrator's speech. Pari Saberis leili o majnoon in dramatic persian Literature and Ahmed Shoghis majnoon leili in Dramatic Arabic Literature Dramatic as other dramatic text consists of dialogue and scene descriptions. Saberi and Shoghi in the dialogue, hide themselves behind his personality that creates and contrast in a scene description directly speak to their readers and give them different information to better understand the interaction and to better visualize . Thus we can say that found both the External and Internal focalization in leili o majnoon and majnoon leili. in the description of the scene, the author does external focalization and in dialogue by the plays characters Internal focalization is done. However, the considerable differences in the model of internal focalization and focalized phrase of these two works connect to the modern and classic plays and playwriters ideology and gender.

Comparing thinker's opinions makes us reach the same comprehension of their insights. In this research, opinions of Mawlawī, eastern mystic and poet (1207-73) and Soren Kierkegaard (1813-55), the father of existentialism, about different levels of becoming better people comparatively have been compared.
Mawlawī and Soren Kierkegaard are two thinkers in the history of human being who due to their similar views towards the universe, have had common prominent ways of thinking. This unanimity especially about human and levels of becoming a better person, needs to be reflected upon. They, as religious thinkers in two different parts of the world and at different times, believe that one is responsible for his fate.
They both believe that there are different steps in reaching perfection.
Mawlawī mentions that in order to become a perfect human being, which is the best level of humanities, one must pass two levels: an imperfect human being and a mujāhid.
Kierkegaard puts forward his opinion in three stages: aesthetical, ethical, and religious. The stages have a lot in common which are explained in the article.

One of the best ways of understanding reflection of the society in the literature is the comparison of the effects of a social content in different communities. This paper, using this method, studies the reflection of the society of author in "Thaïs", "Confabulation of Mullah Ghorbanali" and "Sacred lien". Thaïs by Anatole France, romance novel that theme is “a beautiful woman monk”, accords drew to many scholars and critics. Mohammad-Ali Jamalzadeh also takes effect of Anatole France and wrote the short story with the same theme Confabulation of Mullah Ghorbanali. After he, Tofigh Al-Hakim, an Egyptian writer, attempting to recreate Thaïs in Arabic novel and he created the novel, Sacred lien.
The present study poses, in the first time, the influences of the story French to two stories Persian and Arabic. Then, the Common themes shared between the stories, from the perspective of the sociology of literature, relying on the theory of Lukács will be studied; the themes that the most are “Religious man’’ and “woman’’. And finally, the process of socialization of literature and the highlight role of society of author in all three stories will be showed in the subtle differences.

Hans Christian Andersen has a great difference with Mohammad-Ibn-e-Malek Dad, known as Shams-e-Tabrizi but some characteristics and behavioral features and ethics, also the verbalization of these two writers are very close to each other. These congruencies and similarities will be more interesting when we notice the works of both authors entailing “a duckling”. The duckling encounters the process of individuation in the search to recognize itself. The main question in the present study is that whether there is a relationship between the duckling mentioned by Shams-e-Tabrizi and the ugly duckling introduced by Andersen? Or whether the existence and presence of this issue (individuated duckling) in the works by these authors is completely random and accidental? The present study has been supplied through descriptive-analytic method and a library study. The findings of the present study showed that although we can not find any documents regarding the access of Andersen to books by Shams-e-Tabrizi, some evidences have rejected the random feature of such a study and categorize this study among the comparative studies. Although there are some clear closeness and intellectual similarities that form the main part of these two stories, one can come up with many differences in the route to achieve individuation process. The important thing in this comparative study is that who has been the initiator of this famous fable which has had a global fame?; Shams-e-Tabrizi or christen Andersen from Denmark?