نشریه مطالعات سبک شناختی قرآن کریم
پیاپی 13 (پاییز و زمستان 1402)

Coherence means creating a relationship and continuity between two or more structures that are grammatically equal to each other. Today, there are many factors and tools to create continuity and organization of the semantic-syntactic structure of a text. The components of relational consistency are considered as one of the tools of integration between the phrases of a text, which was proposed by McHoliday and Ruqiyeh Hassan. Conjunctive elements include: Conjunctive elements can appear in four additional, causal, unexpected and temporal types. The element of time connection itself includes four components: sequential, simultaneity, referential and final. Based on the descriptive-analytical method, the present essay examines the role of the mentioned components in the syntactic-semantic organization of the verses of the Holy Quran. The findings of the research show that the components of relational consistency in the selected examples most connected the semantic structure of the sentences to each other, although these elements had an outward manifestation in most of the examples, but by reflecting more on the expressions, it can be realized that these components make the conceptual structure of the text. are linked to each other.

Today, in linguistic studies in the field of word meaning, there are two types of attitudes: the first attitude is the in-time attitude; It means examining the meaning of words historically and the second attitude: it is a contemporary attitude; That is, examining the meaning of words regardless of history and examining the semantic relationships between them, including semantic relationship, semantic inclusion, opposition, linear order relationship, and causal relationship. In the Holy Qur'an, some words have gone out of their cultural and lexical meaning and have found a mystical meaning, and this type is often found in words that are used for tangible phenomena and natural beings. The present essay examines the symbolic meaning of the names of animals in the Holy Quran with a descriptive-analytical approach and based on the knowledge of temporal and simultaneous semantics. The results of the research show that often these words have kept their symbolic meaning in the texts before the revelation of the Qur'an and the texts of the Islamic period, and in the Holy Qur'an, they appear in accordance with the structure of the verses, and based on the knowledge of temporal semantics, between the words It contains symbolic meanings, there is a type of semantic inclusion relationship, causal relationship, linear order relationship, and verbal opposition.

One of the most important serious criteria in the validation of a point of view is the critical study of external epistemic manifestations and the re-examination of its foundations, foundations and fundamental intellectual infrastructures. Linguistic basis is one of the fundamental, important and worthy bases of exploration in the astonishing field of Qur'anic language. This article tries to critically analyze the above-mentioned basis by applying careful intellectual considerations, and thus prove the weakness of the surprising view of the language of the Qur'an. The research method of this article is documentary and analytical, and the findings of the research indicate that the linguistic basis of the astonishing view of the language of the Qur'an has many serious challenges.As the first example, in terms of genealogy, it is consistent with philosophical hermeneutics. The second is considered an incomprehensible attitude in terms of semantics. Third, in terms of methodology, it has the logic of relativism in interpretation and the challenge of negating the essential meaning of the text. Fourth, he sees the narrative forms of imposition and distortion in the interpretation. Therefore, because the astonishing view of the language of the Qur'an is based on a flawed basis, the pattern of the incomprehensible language of the Qur'an and its semantic restlessness is inaudible.

The structure of the language of the Holy Quran is different from the language of other texts in ays and is considered as a standard of the Arabic language. Various factors have made the language of the Quran effective, meaningful and purposeful. This linguistic feature can be observed and proved from different angles. One of these unique features is the feature of purposeful highlighting and highlighting.Which is both in terms of structure and content. Jeffrey Leach's theory was adopted as one of the leading theories in the field of textual highlighting in Surah Qamar. due to its special content and message, full of aberrations and regularities. The result of this research, which was done in a descriptive-analytical manner, was that highlighting in the method of abnormalities and various regularities in order to convey the message to the audience has been widely used in Surah Qamar. In the meantime, syntactic, semantic and lexical aberrations have occurred in it more than other types of abnormalities.

The effectiveness of comprehension methods for text research depends on discovering the serious meaning of God from the verses. Commentators have always used different methods to discover and explain the meanings of the verses.The evidence of written comprehension is different from the text containing the speech structure.In the oral structure, a part of the text in the form of unwritten lines always remains neglected.The present article seeks to introduce the research method with the title "Dialogical Logic" according to the style and speech structure of the Qur'an.The basis of the mentioned method is the oral and gradual descent of the Quran, the element of dialogue and conversation in the form of the speech structure of the QuranAnd the elements of the method of understanding dialogical logic are: knowledge, personality components of the speaker and audience, message and situation.Paying attention to the mentioned elements shows the Quranic space of dialogues as a living space and depicts concepts called unwritten lines.And it provides a deeper and more accurate touch of the meanings of the verses.The application of dialogic logic theory as a new semantic method in Quranic examples shows its effectiveness in the entire Quran.

Examining the appropriateness of the verses of Surah Al-Mujadalah, with the approach of linear order, confronts the audience with challenges; Therefore, in this approach, the content of the Surah may be accused by superficialists due to the lack of appropriateness, the lack of definition of the purpose and general axis, as well as the reference to historical issues that are not valid in today's world. This is while the discovery of the appropriateness of the verses of the Surah by relying on Semitic rhetoric has achievements to defend the aforementioned cases; The application of Semitic rhetoric and the rules of symmetrical order in Surah Al-Mujadaleh illustrated the fit of its verses in three sections with a pattern of axial arrangement and reverse order, and showed that the reference to historical issues, in addition to the educational works that have been in the time of revelation, is a historical example to achieve the purpose It is a surah. The present research, using a descriptive-analytical method, proved that the use of Semitic rhetoric can be useful for understanding the purpose and main focus of the Qur'anic surahs, which have fallen into the aura of ambiguity due to the presentation of various topics in the surahs and a linear view of the appropriateness of the verses; As it was discovered with the help of the theory of Semitic rhetoric, the purpose and the main axis in Surah Al-Mujadalah, which is repeated in three sections alternately and governs the entire structure of the Surah.

The concept of "Shadow" in the Qur'an has a considerable scope in terms of its literal and idiomatic meaning. This word has different meanings in many verses, which have both positive and negative aspects. Therefore, in order to discover and present an image of the position of "Shadow" in the Quran. it is inevitable to know concepts such as interpretation, means of descent and on the other hand synonyms, semantic contradictions,Cohabitation and succession. In such a way that it is necessary to examine the semantic field in the structure of speech by relying on the five axes of rhetoric, synonymy, contrast, coexistence and substitution. And within the context of speech, non-linguistic topics such as interpretation, sources of descent and sometimes knowing the lexical meanings of words should be addressed based on cultures and the opinion of commentators. In this article, with a descriptive-analytical method and considering both linguistic and non-linguistic levels, the semantics of the word "Shadow" is analyzed. The result of the investigation indicates that in the synonymy, the only word that can be found for shadow is the word Fai, the meaning of contrast is semantic, not literal; That is, shadow has several meanings, Like the shadow of heaven in opposition to the shadow of hell or the shadow of mercy in opposition to the shadow of torment. Concepts such as simile, allegory, and irony are also widely used in semantic rhetoric, and the relationships of coexistence and substitution are evident in other verses of the Holy Qur'an.

In this article, the difference between the meaning of the word Alaa and Nemat has been investigated. These two words are used in the Qur'an, but the translators also translated the word "Ala" as "Blessing". If we believe that every word in the Qur'an has its own meaning, there must be a difference in the meaning of these two words. Therefore, to understand the conceptual difference between these two words, we conducted this research. After examining the literal and interpretative meaning of these two words, it is understood that the word "Ala" tells the story of the peak of God's mercy and love, which is one of its examples. From this point of view, "Ala" is a blessing. Also, in blessing, the only consideration is the blessing itself from the material or spiritual aspect, external or internal and [...] But in "ala" in addition to its generality and including all types and examples of "nemat"; It also expresses the attribute of God's power. In the final part, the conceptual commonalities of blessing and blessing with grace, kindness, mercy and grace were pointed out and the difference in meaning of each was explained. This article has been written using library sources and analytical-descriptive method.

The current age is the era of the flourishing of different styles of thematic interpretation methods including the inferential (Istintaqi) method, the revelational (Tanzili) method, and the grounded theory method. Familiarity with these procedures will assist researchers to take more advantage from them and to discover the Qur'anic theory more precisely. Of the most efficient ways to recognize each style is their comparative evaluation; because it is in the light of comparison that the weaknesses and strengths of each style are more revealed and the possibility of upgrading each methods and as a result a higher understanding of God's purpose is provided. Therefore, this article has tried to evaluate the three mentioned procedures concerning thematic interpretation via the method of comparison and analysis and take a step forward towards a more detailed discovery of each procedure. The titles "Quran, a book for history, not in history", "The ability of the Quran to respond to new issues", "The need to discover the perspective of the Quran", "The systematization of the Quran", "The social nature of the problem", "The need to benefit from human experience" are criteria that base on them comparison are made in terms of two aspects of commonality and difference. It seems that each of the mentioned methods is efficient in some ways and needs to be revised in some other ways, which is possible with the comparison made.

According to some thinkers, "cross" is one of the Arabic words, the origin of which is disputed by researchers. This word is one of the words whose meaning and initial usage have undergone changes due to various developments.The importance and necessity of this research is due to the fact that this word has an Iranian origin and has changed its meaning in the Arabic language, and understanding it has a great impact on the understanding of the divine word. This research, with the historical and analytical method and with the aim of investigating the historical and genealogical origin of the word "cross", analyzes the evolution of its meaning in the Arabic language and the historical use of the derivatives of the word "cross" in the context of the verses of the Quran. The results of this research show that the Arabic word "cross" is from the Persian root "chalipa", which was taken as a symbol of sun worship from the ancient Iranian civilization and was used in most of the ancient civilizations. During the religious and cultural developments in various civilizations and ethnicities, this symbol was first referred to as "the gallows" and after the crucifixion of Jesus (pbuh), it became known as the holy and exclusive symbol of Christians. Then, by finding its way into the Arabic language, the concepts of "hardness", "backbone" and "hanging" have also developed in meaning. In the Holy Quran, the two concepts of "man's back bone" and "being hanged" are used in various derivatives.

Modern research about how to recognize the characteristics of verses and surahs with similar meanings or the semantic implications of a word in the verses of the Qur'an is one of the recent approaches in the linguistics of the Holy Qur'an which leads to deeply understand the heart and basics of divine teachings in the Qur’an. The word throne in various verses of the Holy Quran has a lot of meanings, whose position and true meaning is explained based on the structure of the sentence in terms of literature, syntax and rhetoric as well as the collocation and substitution rules. The present study, using the descriptive and analytical method and the statistical community of the verses in which the word throne is used, aims to explain the semantic implications of “throne” in the Holy Qur’an based on the collocation and substitution relations. Considering the synonyms of throne such as science, perfect human heart, sphere, power, etc., it seems that divine throne has many meanings, which are sometimes considered from the material world and sometimes from the immaterial world. One of the most important findings of this study is that the best substitution for the meaning of throne is divine knowledge and devisal.