mohammad rafiq

The problem of mutual relationship between social factors and types of knowledge, which is called "social determination of knowledge", is the external objectivity of knowledge from a social point of view or the impression and identification that different types of human knowledge receive from social factors. The components of this mutual relationship include depth, degree, level, dominant factor and subject. Muhammad Husayn Tabatabai believes that apart from obvious, present, general theoretical knowledge and some general practical knowledge, the rest of knowledge is under the influence of biological, environmental, unseen and social cultural factors that this effect is contingent and does not even reach the stage of causation. The main focus of these epistemological developments is the credibility, especially the post-social credibility, which is completely socially determined. Max Scheler proposed the form and content of knowledge, which considers the content immune from social determination and considers only the form of knowledge to be socially determined. Of course, Tabatabai and Scheler both believe that there is no causality between the community and knowledge and the influence of the community is only to the extent necessary. According to Scheler's opinion, spiritual and real factors jointly determine knowledge. Of course, only the three forms of knowledge of religion, philosophy and science are targeted for determination. Therefore, the extract of Tabatabai's theory goes back to the discussion of validity and Scheler's theory of the form and content of knowledge.

Each action has different components and their recognition is more important than doing it. Indeed, the value of the action is directly related to the recognition of its components. Components are the elements that action is composed of. Some of the components are "pre-action," some of them are "mid-action", and some of them are "post-adaptation". This article seeks to study the components of "mid-action" by an inductive-interpretive and descriptive-analytical method in the Qur'an from the perspective of social studies and to answer this question, "from the point of view of the Qur'an, which components the action is composed of?"
By reviewing the verses, it can be said that the conceptual scope of action in the Quranic scriptures consists of these words: ‘acquisition’, ‘production’, ‘doing’, ‘act’, ‘good’ and ‘evil’. The study of the verses shows that the Qur'an has expressed about twenty stages of "mid-action”, such as: feeling of need, visualization, measuring, comparing, consulting, enthusiasm, choosing, wanting, belief, intention, reason, and cause, will, Final decision, determination, trust, consideration, action, try, accomplishment, patience, and endurance. In order to determine the components, the mechanism, the order, the intensity and weakness of the components of action, one must first determine the type of action, since it is not necessary for each action to have all of these components. Dividing the component into three parts and extracting the maximum steps for the action is one of the research innovations.