جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « نظریه ارزش اسمی » در نشریات گروه « اقتصاد »

The discussion of inflation, devaluation of money and how to compensate for it, is one of the discussions of the scientific, jurisprudential and economic circles. Economists seek to curtail it and the jurists seek to explain the jurisprudential rulings attributed to this phenomenon. The best way to determine the jurisprudential rulings of money and its issues in Islamic economics is to base it. On the other hand, it is a prerequisite for the resolution of the basis of these rulings and the issues of rigorous analysis of the nature of money. This research, using a descriptive-analytical method with difficulty knowing the jurisprudential results of the two theories of "‘Itibari Purchasing power" and the "nominal value theory", presented a third theory of "‘Itibari property". The government guarantee and the reasons for the firm responsible for and shall pay the unfailing restoration and compensation, and given that this loss and waste in the long term in the context of the increase in nominal wages, salary compensation has been fixed at In the short term, this repair will not take place, the jurisprudential ruling of the compensation for the devaluation of money for long-term and short-term debts between people is different.

Money has been the subject of many legal and jurisprudential rules in an Islamic economy. Therefore, understanding the nature of money has gained a high significance. Hence, a number of Muslim scholars have made several attempts to theorize the nature of money. Ayatollah Sadr, ayatollah Bojnordi, ayatollah Shahrodi, and Yosoufi, have tried to explain and attribute the nature of money in its purchasing power. The authors of “money in Islamic economy” have favored the theory of nominal value of money. Examining the background and basis of these theories the present article argue that they are not reliable Therefore the need to develop a new theory on the nature of money remains unfulfilled.