javad sadounzadeh

The Iraqi novel traveled an evolutionary path full of many achievements, which was associated with the transformations of the Iraqi society at different political, cultural, social and economic levels. A reader who follows this path will not hesitate to acknowledge the superiority of some contemporary fiction experiences providing texts that break the monotony of classical writing and open new creative horizons. We will suffice to recall the experience of the Iraqi writer Sinan Anton, where it can be said that it is one of the most outstanding fictional experiences that embodied these transformations in four novels: "Ajam", "Al-Fahres", "The Only Pomegranate Tree" and "O Maryam". This research specifically focuses on Ajam's novel; A novel in which the contradictions and distortions of the readers' horizons are intensified. In the sense that our study examines the impact of the aesthetics of reception in Ajam's novel, through what the theory of the aesthetics of reception was based on, that is, the mechanisms of its pioneers, Yavs and Izer are represented in the horizon of expectation, aesthetic distance and the implied reader. This research also aims to show how the horizon of the readers’ expectation is changed in the novel by adopting the reading and reception theory approach and also explains the expansion of the aesthetic distance in the title and characters.    and finally reveals the implications of the implicit reader in the text

Language has words that have one meaning, and at the same time, different meanings and hidden aesthetics, and scholars have long considered the effective role of "spiritual sharing" and "verbal sharing" in the interpretation of religious texts. With the formation of modern semantic knowledge, linguists have been concerned with a similar issue called "polysemy" and "homonymy". It is a linguistic unit (word) that indicates several different meanings that are conceptually related to each other. This linguistic concept has also been considered in the tradition of Islamic studies and is referred to as "spiritual sharing". "Polysemy" in semantics refers to a special kind of "semantic relations" in which a linguistic unit (word) refers to several different meanings that are conceptually related to each other. This linguistic concept in the tradition of Islamic studies has also been considered and referred to as "spiritual communion". Also, an important part of the literature on "face writing" in the field of interpretive studies, which is responsible for discussing the variety of uses of a word according to its position in the text of the Holy Quran, is devoted to it. In semantic knowledge, in addition to "polysemy", "homonymy" is discussed and considers it to be the result of the "phonetic-homonymous" words which refer to various and unrelated meanings. This linguistic term, which in the tradition of Islamic studies is called "verbal sharing", in addition to lexicography, has also been considered in the sciences of logic and the principles of jurisprudence. Muslim scholars have called a word that implies two or more true meanings common to the word, and have tried to investigate the causes of its occurrence. The need to distinguish between "polysemy" and "homonym" in lexical analysis has led linguists to suggest the study of the historical background of common words through etymology in order to distinguish them from each other. In this way, word etymology can alert the linguist to the occurrence of verbal commonality, freeing him from the trap of formal similarities and finding false semantic connections. On the other hand, this method is able to explain the semantic relations of the word polysemy (spiritual common) that was previously ignored, and to discuss the process of constructing meanings by discovering the links of the semantic chain. The present study is about Quranic convergent words in linguistics and Islamic interpretations and was able to provide linguistic evidence to reveal the existence of convergence in some words of these roots that have not been considered so far.