mohammadali abdullahi

Determining the meaning of the text is one of the important issues of contemporary language philosophy. Philosophical hermeneutics, in response to this problem, believes in the indeterminacy of the meaning of the text. Determining the meaning of the text has been proposed with regard to the many meanings that determination has in terms of ontology, semantics, epistemology and methodology, and among them, the determination of the meaning of the text in the sense of "discovering the meaning of the speaker" has been discussed in the light of semantic foundations.

Determining the meaning of the text is defined in the triad of "possibility, probability, and determination" and this matching has been done by emphasizing the views of Searle and Shahid Sadr with library and analytical methods and sometimes using hybrid methods and linguistic philosophy.

John Searle has explained the meaning of the text by relying on basics such as the theory of speech act, Intentionality, and collective Intentionality, and by emphasizing methods such as concentration and linguistic descriptions, classification of speech acts and rules, and by emphasizing the anatomy of the brain, and in other words, He has achieved the explanation of the organization of the institutional communication of meaning; And on the other hand, Martyr Shahid Sadr, relying on the issues of status (vaze) and Strict conjugation (qarn akid), the theory of usage (Istimal), the authority of emergence (hojat) and the linguistic system, and a special effort in the social understanding of the text (nas), relying on the method of manifestation and possibilities, in a kind of natural definition of determining their meaning in the light Social understanding is achieved.

The findings of this research show that the two researchers have a point in common in "no reference to extra-language", "regularity of language", "authenticity of appearance and rules", "contextualism" and in "confusion between the definite article and the spoken verb", "linguistic communication unit", "criterion of meaningfulness and provability", "institutional explanation of meaning", "theory of implication", "meaning and intention" and "theory of application and use" have been distinguished from each other. Therefore, the intellectual difference between the two intellectual traditions in the issue of determining meaning can be seen as arising from the intellectual paradigm of the two thinkers, on the other hand, it should be noted that the social rules of meaning and relying on the rules of consistency in Searle's view and his reliance on institutional realities and Shahid Sadr's emphasis on linguistic concentration and authenticity arising from the degree of truth and probability is more rooted in two intellectual paradigms, institutional and proof of meaning, and it should be examined in the context of meaning; Searle's reliance on individual Intentionality and his rejection of it in terms of collective Intentionality are seen very faintly in the Shahid Sadr view’s, perhaps if it were not for the fallacy of confusion between validity and truth and the science of the principles of jurisprudence did not find its language in philosophy and theoretical sciences, the attempt The theoretical approaches to connect the layer of probability to determination, or the layer of suspicion to certainty in the science of the principles of jurisprudence, do not remain incomplete. The efforts of analytical philosophy in the analysis of intention in the subjective and universal layers and his deep investigations on issues based on intention in the science of principles and the intellectual system of Shahid Sadr are effective and can change them.

The relationship between faith and action has not only been the concern of theologians, but also the philosophers have been discussing it. Wittgenstein is one of those philosophers who in both theory and practice have been concerned with the relationship between faith and action - albeit in his own way. Even in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, which may seem to be merely a pure logical and philosophical work, he has tried to address the issue of faith and action. It is due to this intention that the "sayable" and "showable" discussions are included in the treatise. From his point of view, faith is one of the facts that the believer shows in his action; therefore, there is a concomitance between the intention and action in his view. In this article, we show this claim with many evidences in Wittgenstein's works and the works of his commentators.

One of the most important ideas about the analysis of moral concepts and propositions is Non-naturalistic theory. This study aimed to analysis and criticize of the George Moore's Theory on Moral Non-Naturalism.
In this analytical research, after analyzing the basic concepts, the George Moore's Theory on Moral Non-Naturalism is interpreted and criticized.
Findings: Based on this theory, moral terms are signs and indications of the characteristics of objects, but it is not acceptable that the terms which referred to by words such as "good" and "must" can be defined based on immoral terms. According to this view moral terms can only be understood by rational intuition, not through empirical observation or metaphysical reasoning. These issues can form the theoretical foundations of bioethics. Problems such as: indefinability of simple qualities, the type of abnormal characteristics, non-experiential (a priori) and intuition led to the emergence of emotivism, in spite of two centuries of loneliness of the Non-naturalistic theory. As the main result, the birth of the emotivism could be searched in the structural and internal problems of Non-naturalistic theory. So that, in spite of presenting a new plan in the field of analyzing concepts and moral propositions, Non-naturalistic theory due to numerous epistemological and ontological problems failed to meet expectations.
The findings showed that both of Non-naturalistic theory and the emotivism caused the readiness to develop other theories in the field of bioethics.

Idea, the principal term in Spinoza’s epistemology, is an indirect mode for the attribute of thought. Idea is a primary, active, and judgmental constituent of the human soul. Different kinds of idea entail: imagination, reasoning, and intuition. Having the same meaning, truth and adequacy are the criteria of its validity. Correspondence is an extrinsic mark of the truth of idea and explanation, whereas, evidence, clearness, and distinctness are the intrinsic marks of the adequacy of the idea. According to Spinoza, knowledge is divided to two kinds, complete knowledge and incomplete knowledge, the common feature of which is "justified belief". So knowledge is a belief (an idea with judgment) which has a justification (causal explanation or sensory evidence). Therefore, imagination, reasoning, and intuition are from thecategory of knowledge, however, only the second and the third are regarded as complete knowledge.