unity of identity

Aliqoli ibn Qurchaghay Khan is one of the philosopher-theologians of the Isfahan philosophical school. He has written various treatises and books in various fields such as philosophy, Quranic interpretation and hadith. One of the short treatises that he has written is the treatise on the Unity of Identity and True Objectivity, which has not been corrected until now. In this treatise, he has tried to provide an accurate interpretation of concepts such as object, non-object, shadow, the validity of the realities of objects and human attributes, and to explain the similarities and differences between his own views and the Sufi approach. In the present study, in addition to researching and correcting the treatise, some of the issues raised have been analyzed and reviewed. "The inadequacy of his interpretation of the ambiguity of possibilities and creatures", "The incorrectness of comparing creatures to the image of a double-sighted person" and "The non-attribution of God to the determination of possible beings" are three criticisms that are ultimately applied to the author's views in this treatise.

The aim of this article is to consider Hegel's unity, which is "the Unity of Identity and Difference" Or to examine and explain the "unity of seemingly contradictory features in a single coherent whole" in the light of the main problem of Hegel's philosophy, that is, the overcoming of divisions or dualities, as the solution of her philosophy. Unity (Einheit) is an important ideal, goal and end for Hegel's philosophical system. Hence, in his entire philosophical system and in different periods of his intellectual life, the traces of the search for unity are always obvious, from the beautiful artistic unity in Greece to his desired unity, which is a rational, speculative, philosophical, absolute and Mediated unity. For him, the whole of philosophy is nothing but the study of the definition of unity and its realization in society. A unity that, instead of eliminating or absorbing another, tries to preserve and eliminate pluralities and differences by accepting and recognizing another in a single coherent whole. A unity in which differences and dualities do not disappear but are preserved as necessary and inevitable moments. Unity that is not the result of direct intuition but the product and result of passing through different stages and an intersubjective matter. For Hegel, it is not atomism and excessive individualism in the modern world that lead to rupture, not mere mystical and abstract unions that wipe out all differences, but the unity of the whole in which All distinctions are preserved.

There is no doubt that solidarity among human beings constitute the main core of a civilization. Without solidarity, a civilization is doomed to collapse. But the question is: which factors might lead people, with all their differences, towards solidarity and unity? Scholars of civilization have considered different factors such as race, language, religion, manners, customs, and the like. Allama Ja’fari sees these factors as objectionable, and has tried to identify factors that lead to a real and sustainable unity among people. In this paper, we have considered two classes of motivational factors—intrinsic and extrinsic—in order to analyze Allama Ja’fari’s views. Within extrinsic factors, we have examined rational, moral, survival-based, and divine factors. As a conclusion, we think that extrinsic factors cannot lead people to sustainable unity because of their impermanence and utilitarian character. They can merely provide preparations for such unity. Intrinsic factors, however, can establish a sustainable unity because of their permanence and their origin in inner human substance. All in all, these factors give rise to the formation of a single entity for human communities and the desired unity in civilization.