evaluation model

The main goal of the present research was to design a model for evaluating the effectiveness of university research, which was achieved using the meta-synthesis method. First, with the aim of identifying the dimensions, criteria and indicators of the effectiveness of academic research, selected keywords were searched in the most important domestic and foreign reliable academic journals and databases and the number of 262 related studies was identified and extracted among which 30 related scientific studies were selected according to using certain criteria. In the next step, with applying the method of content analysis, the related codes and concepts were extracted and then criteria and indicators related to each of the dimensions were identified and the findings were categorized upon them. Then, the key findings under the three dimensions of "inputs, outputs and effectiveness (internal and external aspects)" of academic research were compiled. The results showed that this proposed multidimensional and integrated model is unique and can be considered as an effective tool for evaluating the effectiveness of academic research at the disposal of researchers, policy makers and practitioners. Its application and implementation can improve the quality of decision-making process as well as the resource allocation decisions at different operational levels of the university.

Researcher evaluation is not just about prioritizing them. It is also there to compensate for their services or to attract them to research organizations. Above, evaluation is used as one of the methods of creating organizational commitment, promoting and guiding research capacity, increasing the level of satisfaction with research work and finally solving real problems and improving the welfare of society. The purpose of this study is to reconstruct the evaluation metrics of researchers based on scientific documents related to this field and finally to provide a suitable comprehensive framework that meets the expectations of a committed, knowledgeable and problem-solving researcher. The method used in this research is a combination of scientific documents in which 118 scientific documents were used. Extracting the strengths and weaknesses of the main and complementary methods of researchers' evaluation, identifying the risks of traditional evaluation and new restorative measures called metamorphoses are among the most important research findings. The comprehensive evaluation model of researchers as the main result of the research, which consists of five levels. According to the model, the researchers' scientific documents are the result of the researcher's individual characteristics multiplied by the research ecosystem, which are measured by judges appropriate to the type and purpose of the research. In any case, research is defensible and useful when it leads to economic improvement or theory development in the medium term and increased authority and public welfare in the long run.

Change is an organizational fact and its management is considered one of the most important duties of manager. It is worth nothing that studies show that more than three fourth of organizational changes are doomed to failure or cannot realize the envisaged goals. Devising effective strategies and implementing them successfully in the organization requires providing infrastructures and having appropriate capabilities and enough maturity in various dimensions. Not paying enough attention to this has been responsible for the failure of implementing strategies in organizations. The subject of this research is strategic change in specialized organizations affiliated to the public sector. Due to the complexity of these organizations, strategic change and implementing strategic in them are challenging. This research has been conducted with the aim of devising and developing a model for evaluating the readiness of Affiliated to the public sector. In this section, The general attitude of this research is of qualitative nature and is in line with deepening the understanding of the issue of strategic change in a complex setting. In this way, in the first sechion, we directed our attention to research on the atmosphere governing strategic change in specialized organizations Of an organization for strategic changes and implementing a strategy effective fields in strategic change and implementing strategic were identified then an appropriate conceptual framework for ministry of energy was used. The method of research is case study approach and for data gathering and analysis and also drawing conclusion, we used systematic review method by drawing upon met-synthesis method and content analysis of scientific documents. Through evaluating relevant factors, we identified eight main codes including communications, creating an atmosphere encouraging participation and confidence in the organization, evaluating and monitoring change, educating human resources, and leading change and planning. These codes are result of reviewing more than one hundred selected articles on the basis of meta-synthesis about readiness for change which could be used as an efficient model for evaluating and assessment of the degree of readiness of organization to bring about strategic changes.