Sadra Model in the Commentary of Equality In Human Rights

There are two discourse on human rights: Contractual and Un-contractual. Equality and Equality before the law is based on Deserve equality; for this reason, in un-contractual discourse, Deserve equality is objective and it rooted in comprehensive truth and unit. But in contractual discourse, deserve equality is obtained with credibility. Although, contractual discourse conflict with common nature as source of law, but objective equality of contractual discourse doesn’t conflict with Multiplicity of species because although in Sadraee plan human beings are equal according to inside but in the contract can consider for them equal nature. Multiplicity of species in Mullasadra is not compatible with un-contractual discourse. The main question in this paper is: In un-contractual discourse how can we speak of social equity while we accept Multiplicity of species? This research achievement is:According to Mulla Sadra's philosophy can be Proposed two models of The interpretation of the principle of equality: "objective equality in the unequivocal" and "objective equality in the non-unequivocal". And considering the objective of the two models in the philosophy of Sadra and order over mental model And prefer that the mental model, We do not need to plan mental model in philosophy of Sadra. Model "objective equality in the non-unequivocal" in the interpretation of the principle of equality of initiatives this query