Inconsistency in the hermeneutic system of Mojtahed Shabestari

Mr. Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari is a contemporary dissident which, based on the principles derived from hermeneutics, has analyzed various religious and social issues and he has produced a lot of works. He introduced his thought base, as well as the thought-maker of his hermeneutic system, on the twentieth-century Continental Philosophy of Germany and in its importance it has said that now the problem of the Islamic world is not resort to hermeneutical school taken from philosophical hermeneutics. However, his hermeneutic system is a collection of elements which is non-academic from various hermeneutic schools which unscientificly has been borrowed and put together from the hermeneutic schools, which are completely opposite and even contradictory in the foundations as well as in the buildings. For example, he spoke on the of anthropological and semantic principles and also the place of interpretation in understanding the meaning based on doctrines of methodic hermeneutic and methodological hermeneutic, and also he has chosen a combination of philosophical hermeneutics and methodic hermeneutics in the subject of epistemology of understanding and its process. In addition, his conception of Schleiermacher's methodological is inaccurate, and is incorrectly identified his main problem. This paper tries to illustrate and discuss these non-technical adaptations and misconceptions.