Comparative Analysis of Viepoints of Fakhr Razi and Allameh Tabataba'i on Doubts of Physical Resurrection

The subject of physical and spiritual resurrection is one of the most challenging theological issues among Islamic scholars. Meanwhile, Fakhr Razi and Allameh Tabataba'i believe in spiritual resurrection. In this study, we intend to analyze the content and approach of the two great thinkers about the most significant resurrection doubts. A closer look at the works of Razi reveals that his words are more explicit on physical resurrection. He responds to the Corrosive and Eaten of deceit and man. Since he considers restorations permissible and God Almighty, he concludes that Restoration of Non-being is not abstained. Razi, in the immateriality of the human soul Doubt, refers to the contradiction of the soul and the body, which is separated from him when he dies and ascends to the universe. Also, the verses quoted by him do not indicate that the soul that is other than the body is Immateriality or not Immateriality. In contrast, Tabatabai avoids the Corrosive and Eaten and the Restoration of Non-being Doubt. In his view, there is nothing in the body and soul, because the body changes to other elements, and the soul is a Immateriality thing that is not corrupted by the death of the body. Tabataba'i, in response to the immateriality of the human soul of self-objectification Doubt, considers the regards the object as object, not matter. He believes that our body in the resurrection is like the earthly body. He also considers being objective in the self and preserving the human personality.