Intra-discourse Critiques of the Idea of Religious Science

Intra-discourse critiques of the idea of religious science can be divided into three categories: external, internal and consequential. In the external critique of religious science, we claim that, firstly, it suffers from a kind of mild passivity, and secondly, it appeals to guardians and supporters who are neither active nor permissible nor righteous. In its internal critique, we have shown that science and religion are not alien to each other in the same way as dualism; rather, there are relations between them that can be divided into four categories. Providing metaphysics of science that is done by religion. Motivation, prioritization, and the application of religion to science. Constructing scientific concepts, theories, and hypotheses from religion as a source alongside other sources. The use of science is one of the special proofs of that religion. The only thing that justifies the religious allocation for science is the latter, which is also impossible, because it takes science out of its finite and presupposed framework.