A Comparative Study and Evaluation of Mulla Sadra's argument of the truthful ones and the Possibility and Obligations of Ibn Sina and Thomas Aquinas

The proof of possibility and necessity was first described by Ibn Sina and he called it the argument of the truthful ones. Thomas Aquinas Under the influence of Islamic philosophers has also provided some proof of this argument And it's the third path of his theology. Mulla Sadra, after presenting the proof of the possibility of cinema and the introduction of criticism Drawing on the original principles of transcendent wisdom, he has devised a new version of the Siddiqin argument. And He knows it the way of prophets, mystics and divine philosophers. The present article, while presenting an analysis of these three interpretations and examining their subscriptions and ratings, shows that First, none of these interpretations are error-free. Secondly, Ibn Sina's argument is more honorable than that of Thomas and Mulla Sadra's argument both. Reasoning from Essence to Essence and Attributes, systematically explaining and justifying causality, and drawing a unified relationship between God and the world on the basis of the possibility of poverty, originality, and the objective existence of existence, and the need for distant nullification and supremacy, are the most important aspects of the Sadrian argument.