Review and Analysis of the Likelihood of Credit Money from a Jurisprudential-Legal Perspective

Money is the subject of some jurisprudential and legal rulings and the existing jurisprudential theories that have been presented for money with the past nature and relative stability of value do not meet the real needs in current situation. The theory of purchasing power about the nature of money is preferred for reasons that the jurist cannot issue a correct verdict about it without knowing its current nature. Today it is fundamentally different from the nature of money fourteen centuries ago, and consequently its rulings have fundamentally been changed, so understanding its nature has become particularly important. The question is related to the origin of credit money. Is it purchasing power or its nominal and apparent value? Is the amount of value reserve also one of the functions of credit money? Opponents of compensating devaluation consider money as a paradigm. In the face of usury, they advocate the need for reduction. Value is considered as money, but real value or purchasing power is considered as equivalent to credit money, so the need to compensate for the devaluation is not considered usury, given that the devaluation of money is part of the principle of religion and in Article 522 BC claim damages are accepted. Hence, in addition to claiming the devaluation of money, one can claim the alleged damage of the legislator, which is provided for in Article 522 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It has been expressed along with critique, review, descriptive-analytical method and collection of library information.