The Privileges and Challenges of the Application of Cognitive Neuroscientific Evidence in the Criminal Trials

This paper relying on the descriptive-analytic method attempts to analyze neuroscientific evidence in the criminal files. The modern techniques of neuroscientific measurement such as functional imaging are a background of the production of neuroscience data. The validation of the neuroscientific evidence by examining privileges and limits held within it will take place. According to the findings of the research cognitive neuroscientific evidence despite its limits such as costly, causing suffering, and uncertainty, … can be supporting evidence along with other criminal evidence concerning the degree of self-control on behavior, the completion of the psychological findings in the personality file, the realization of the Penal majority, … The application of such presumptions in criminal trials requires the explanation of the basic strategies to resolve human rights challenges and ethical challenges.