A jurisprudential analysis of the necessity of husband's permission regarding wife's cosmetic surgeries

Family system jurisprudence is one of the major types of jurisprudence, which looks at family issues with a holistic view, and the marriage contract, as one of the important pillars of this system, creates obligations for the parties like other contracts. One of the challenging issues in this field is the legitimacy of beauty practices without the spouse's permission. In a descriptive-analytical way, this article tries to investigate the limits and limitations of the husband's permission in cosmetic surgery and whether the marriage contract causes the wife to have no ownership over her body. Or should the wife take permission from her husband to do anything she wants to do with her body? The findings of this research, which is a study based on the macro-jurisprudence of the family system, indicate that by reflecting on the benefits of cosmetic surgery in repairing and correcting physical and appearance defects and the opinions of contemporary jurists on the permissibility of surgeries that are performed for the purpose of beautification, doubts It solves the fundamental issue regarding the legitimacy of cosmetic surgery and it is not possible to achieve the necessity of spouse's permission absolutely in the jurisprudence of the family system; Rather, the necessity of permission in the jurisprudence of the family system is only in the field of family interests.