fazel feizi

The Islamic Revolution of Iran in February 1979, as a major phenomenon like other great revolutions, has had wide-ranging global implications. Its Islamic nature, along with Iran's geopolitical and strategic position in the Middle East and the existence of corridors connecting Asia, Europe, and Africa, compelled the international relations scene to pay attention to this important development and its impact on the international arena. The purpose of this article is to answer the question of how the important theories of international relations have reacted to the actions and reactions of the Islamic Revolution in Iran? The emergence and spread of revolutionary theories and the creation of an ideology independent of dominant ideologies such as liberalism, communism, Arab nationalism, and Zionism led to a change in global beliefs and perspectives on new issues such as equality, human value in society, and divine nature. Therefore, if we consider the theories of international relations, which are mainly based on secularism, as machines with inputs and outputs, these machines were faced with a new undefined input that now needed to either change their definitions or ignore this input. This analogy shows that revolutionary theories have led to the emergence of a new perspective for the creation of complementary theories in order to be able to cover the shortcomings of these theories in combining religion and politics, just as the theory of balance of power covered the weaknesses of realism.

Land and "Land Policy" have always been important social issues that are related to and dependent on the policies and governance models of different countries. In contemporary Iranian history, the issue of land has always been an unresolved matter and a focus of the government's attention. The significance and sensitivity of this issue led policymakers to immediately address it after the Islamic Revolution, and the specific legal, social, and political concerns in this area prompted the formulation and implementation of a new policy for land distribution in rural areas of the country. Given the importance of this topic, the central theme of this research is the transformations that occurred in the field of rural land ownership in Iran under the influence of the Islamic Revolution, with the main goal of examining the impact that the phenomenon of the Iranian Islamic Revolution had on land policy in Iran. Therefore, the main question of this article is ‘What was the land policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in rural areas and on what principles, foundations, and implementation methods was it based?’ In response to this question, using a comparative method, we have addressed the land policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in rural areas and ultimately examined this policy by presenting a model.

In this article we have attempted  to examine the position of soft power on the statement of the second step from the point of view of political science.This article sought to answer the question, what are the most fundamental elements affecting the national power of Iran in the statement of the second step of the Islamic Revolution? Based on the findings of this article, which was obtained by using the descriptive-analytical method, the statement while paying attention to the hardware and software dimensions of national power, the most fundamental element of the national power of the Islamic Republic of Iran is the soft power based on the Islamic Revolution values, faith, divine motivation and Velayat-e Faqih. since the values of the Islamic Revolution are based on human nature, they are welcomed by all human societies and provide huge power to Iran.

Iran nuclear issue has been one of the main concerns for Iran and great powers in two decades. While the nuclear negotiations as a diplomatic instrument has been fallowed in different forms and ways, putted away in Trump administration. After victory of Joe Biden in presidential election in U.S., Iran’s nuclear negotiations have followed by 4+1 group. Although Iran’s nuclear negotiations has been influenced by many varies variable, in this article we have focused on transatlantic relations effect. According to this, the main question is: what is the effect of transatlantic relations on Iran’s nuclear negotiations in Biden administration? For answering to this question, we tried to do this research by combining method and library and documental methods and applying the theory of constructivism. The result of this article shows, when transatlantic relations turns on multilateral and integral form as we see in Biden administration, more probably the nuclear negotiations will led to revive of JCPOA.Transatlantic , constructivism , Nato , nuclear negotiations, Joe Biden, 4+1 group.

Identity Explanation about the Conflicts Structure in the Relation of United State of America and Islamic Republic of Iran Abstract The occurrence of the Islamic revolutionary of Iran in 1357, it was a occurrence that its identity discourse in foreign policy ( discourse of revolutionary idealism) was based on discourse elements such as autonomy, fighting against imperialism and colonial powers and support of liberator movements. Basically creation this kind of discourse in a country and region that was regarded as a stable island for United State of America was not concerted with aim and interests of U.S. conquering the embassy of U.S. by the students of follower of Imam Line, U.S disconnected its diplomatic relation with Iran as well as undertake a wide range of hostile actions against Iran that was continued in past four decade up to this time. In this research meanwhile we study on the obstacle of the evolution of two state relations, we try to study the conflict of their interests from the viewpoint of identity and norms that appraise their identity, as it is emphasized on constructive theory of international relations. Finally we conclude that although in some certain and defined cases were holed limited negotiations between two states, because of coflictual identity ,there is not any possibility to fundamental change the relation of Iran and United State of America.