جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « semantic opposition » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

Directional and symmetrical opposition are considered two common types of semantic opposition. Semantic opposition is a special topic of semantics. Semantic opposition is one of the most important and frequent semantic relations in Nahj al-Balagha. The variety of semantic opposition in this world and the hereafter creates a variety of semantic implications, which is one of the necessary tools in the semantic analysis of this literary work. The present research is compiled by the descriptive-analytical method. In this research, due to the widespread discussion of the semantic opposition between the attributes of this world and the hereafter in the sermons of Nahj al-Balagha, two common types of opposition between these attributes were investigated. The results showed that, Imam has drawn some features for the world and the hereafter, which represent the opposites of different directions with respect to the reference point and are referred to as directional opposites. These opposites, including 15 cases, are considered one of the most frequent types of opposites between the mutual attributes of this world and the hereafter. Pairs of mutual attributes according to the features of symmetrical opposition, which have the lowest frequency between the attributes of this world and the hereafter, including 3 items, are placed after the directional opposition. Imam has used these attributes to express the features of this world and the hereafter; the occurrence of one of the reciprocal words implies the occurrence of the other word.

One of the prominent features of a language is the Semantic opposition which has been developed in the modern structural semantics. Semantic opposition is one kind of the conceptual relations at the level of words, by which as well as other conceptual relationships, the semantic field of the vocabulary can be obtained. Recognition of the antonyms of each word is effective in making the exact meaning of the word clear. Discovering the semantic field is based on one of the accepted and practical oppositions in semantics. Regarding the meaning of Haq (=right), there are dispersed works in the field of law, whereas no independent research has been carried out with regard to its semantic oppositions. Hence the present study as an independent one is conducted. The current paper has been carried out through a descriptive-analytic method to explain the semantic opposition of Haq and Batil (right and wrong) in the Holy Koran on the basis of lexical semantics. By making a distinction among the semantic components of Haq and Batil separately, it concluded that the word Haq has 3 antonyms in the Holy Koran. Haq is in complementary opposition with such words as باطل, کذب, and لعب. It is in lexical opposition with the expression بغیر الحق and in implicit opposition with such words as ظن, شرک and ظلم.