جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "Bupivacaine" در نشریات گروه "پزشکی"
-
ObjectivesThe study evaluated sensory and motor block onset time, duration, and intensity, as well as pain intensity, sedation levels, and vital signs, showing that adding dexamethasone to bupivacaine improved sensory and motor block onset time, duration, and intensity, enhanced sedation effects. Axillary plexus block is a common type of anesthesia for surgical management of upper extremity injuries.MethodsThis prospective clinical trial included 72 patients over 18 years of age who were candidates for surgical management of upper extremity injuries with the axillary plexus block approach. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: group BD [30 ml bupivacaine 0.25% with 2ml dexamethasone (n=36)] and group B [30 ml bupivacaine 0.25% with 2ml distilled water (n=36)]. The Pinprick test and Modified Bromage Scale (MBS) were used to evaluate the sensory and motor block levels. Additionally, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) were used to assess pain intensity and degree of sedation. All collected data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20 software.ResultsThe mean age of patients in the B and BD groups was 34.41±11.11 and 36.8±13.3, respectively. According to the results, there was a significant difference in the average time of sensory and motor block onset between two groups, with group BD showing shorter onset time compared to group B (P<0.001). Moreover, the mean duration and intensity of the sensory and motor block were significantly higher in group BD (P<0.05). Additionally, the degree of sedation changes after the block started were more pronounced in group BD. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding changes in pain intensity, heart rates (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), and complications (P>0.05).ConclusionAdding dexamethasone to bupivacaine as a safe adjuvant drug effectively prolongs the axillary plexus block time duration and reduces post-surgery pain. Furthermore, it accelerates the onset time of sensory and motor block.
Level of evidence: IIKeywords: Adjuvant, Axillary Plexus Block, Bupivacaine, Dexamethasone, Ultrasonography Guide -
مجله دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران، سال هشتاد و دوم شماره 4 (پیاپی 279، تیر 1403)، صص 314 -322زمینه و هدف
به تازگی از اپی نفرین برای افزایش عمق و طول مدت بی دردی حاصل از بی حس کننده های موضعی استفاده می شود و به صورت موضعی برای کاهش انتشار بی حس کننده موضعی و کاهش خونریزی ناشی از جراحی به طور گسترده مورد استفاده قرار می گیرد. بنابراین این مطالعه با هدف بررسی تاثیر افزودن دوزکم اپی نفرین به همراه بوپیواکایین داخل نخاعی و فنتانیل بر ثبات همودینامیک بیماران تحت عمل جراحی ارتوپدی اندام تحتانی انجام شد.
روش بررسیاین مطالعه کارآزمایی بالینی تصادفی شده دو سویه کور بر روی 30 بیمار 18 تا 85 سال تحت عمل جراحی ارتوپدی اندام تحتانی مراجعه کننده به بیمارستان پیمانیه شهرستان جهرم از شهریور تا آذر1400، انجام شد. بیماران به روش تخصیص تصادفی به دو گروه، A (اپی نفرین+فنتانیل+ بوپیواکایین) و گروه B (بوپیواکایین+ فنتانیل)، تقسیم بندی شدند. فشارخون سیستول، فشارخون دیاستول، فشارخون متوسط شریانی، ضربان قلب و میزان اشباع اکسیژن خون شریانی در زمان های پیش و پس از بی حسی، حین عمل و ورود و خروج از ریکاوری ثبت شد.
یافته هامیانگین فشارخون سیستولیک، دیاستولیک، متوسط شریانی و ضربان قلب در زمان های پیش و پس از بی حسی، 15، 45،30، 60،75، 90، 120 دقیقه پس از تزریق دارو و در ورود به ریکاوری و خارج از ریکاوری، بین دو گروه اپی نفرین+ فنتانیل+بوپیوکائین و فنتانیل+بوپیوکائین تفاوت معنادار نداشت. میانگین O2SAT در زمان های قبل از بی حسی، 15، 30 و 75 دقیقه پس از تزریق دارو، بین دو گروه اپی نفرین+ فنتانیل+بوپیوکائین و فنتانیل+بوپیوکائین تفاوت معنا دار وجود داشت (05/0>P).
نتیجه گیریاستفاده از ترکیب اپی نفرین+ فنتانیل+بوپیوکائین داخل نخاعی نسبت به ترکیب فنتانیل+ بوپیواکایین تفاوت قابل توجهی در متغیرهای بررسی شده علایم حیاتی بیماران نداشته است.
کلید واژگان: بوپیواکائین, اپی نفرین, فنتانیل, همودینامیک, ارتوپدیBackgroundRecently, epinephrine is used to increase the depth and duration of local anesthetic pain, and it is widely used topically to reduce local anesthetic release and reduce bleeding caused by surgery.
MethodsThis study was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial on 30 patients aged 18 to 85 years undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery referred to Peymaniyeh Hospital in Jahrom from September to December 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups, A (epinephrine+fentanyl+bupivacaine) and B (bupivacaine+fentanyl). Systolic blood pressure, diastolic pressure, mean arterial pressure, arterial blood oxygen saturation percentage, and pulse rate were measured and recorded before drug administration, before spinal anesthesia, after anesthesia, and then every half hour until the end of surgery (15, 45, 30, 60, 75, 90, 120) and during recovery. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 21 software and descriptive (mean, standard deviation) and inferential statistics (t-test, chi-square, Mann-Whitney, Friedman) at a significance level of P<0.05.
ResultsThirty patients aged 18 to 85 years (in two groups of 15) with anesthesia class I and II undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery were evaluated. The study groups are matched in terms of age and gender variables. There was no significant difference in mean systolic, diastolic, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rate before and after anesthesia, 15, 45, 30, 60, 75, 90, and 120 minutes after drug injection, and at entry and exit from recovery between the Epinephrine+Fentanyl+Bupivacaine and Fentanyl+Bupivacaine groups. There was a significant difference in mean O2SAT before anesthesia, 15, 30, and 75 minutes after drug injection between the epinephrine+fentanyl+bupivacaine and fentanyl+ bupivacaine groups (P<0.05).
ConclusionThe use of the combination of epinephrine+fentanyl+intrathecal bupivacaine compared to the combination of fentanyl+bupivacaine did not have a significant difference in the studied variables of patients' vital signs.
Keywords: Bupivacaine, Epinephrine, Fentanyl, Hemodynamic, Orthopedics -
Background
Postoperative shoulder pain is one of the most common complications following laparoscopic surgery. Various interventions have been proposed to control this pain.
ObjectivesThe main objective of this comparative study was to determine the effects of intraperitoneal bupivacaine and normal saline infusion, in combination with lung recruitment maneuver (LRM), on shoulder pain following laparoscopic surgery.
MethodsThe present randomized controlled trial was conducted on 105 candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy referred to Imam Ali Hospital in Bojnurd, Iran, from November 2021 to June 2022. The patients were assigned to three groups using block randomization: BR (receiving 50 cc of 0.25% diluted intraperitoneal bupivacaine + LRM), NR (receiving 50 cc of intraperitoneal normal saline + LRM), and N (receiving 50 cc of intraperitoneal normal saline). Postoperative shoulder pain and surgical incision site pain were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at recovery intervals of 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. Additionally, the prevalence of nausea and vomiting, the first time of need for sedation, and the incidence of sedation overdose in the first 24 hours after surgery were investigated. The data were analyzed using one-way analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SPSS software at a significance level of 0.05.
ResultsThe findings showed no significant differences in demographic variables between the three groups. The range and mean score of shoulder pain based on VAS was 0 - 1 (0.3) in the BR group, 0 - 2 (1.4) in the NR group, and 1 - 3 (2.1) in the N group at 4 hours after surgery. The mean score of shoulder pain intensity in the BR group was lower compared to the NR and N groups during recovery time intervals at 4, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. This difference between groups was significant. There was also a statistically significant difference in the mean score of surgical incision site pain intensity and the first time of need for sedation between the three groups. The occurrence of side effects was not significant between the groups. Itching, bradycardia, and hypotension were not observed in any of the groups.
ConclusionsThe findings of this study showed that bupivacaine, along with LRM, is a safe method effective in relieving postoperative shoulder pain. It prolonged the first time of need for sedation and significantly reduced the incidence of shoulder pain.
Keywords: Bupivacaine, Normal Saline, Lung Recruitment Maneuver, Shoulder Pain, Intraperitoneal, Laparoscopy -
Background
Postoperative pain management can be achieved by adjuvant medications during the analgesia procedure. The study investigated the effect of intrathecal dexamethasone-bupivacaine combination with bupivacaine alone in spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
MethodsThis randomized, double-blind clinical examination included 50 females who had previously experienced a cesarean section. The participants were assigned randomly into two categories: the intervention group, received intrathecal bupivacaine-dexamethasone, and the control group, received intrathecal bupivacaine-normal saline. Levels of pain were evaluated using a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS) at intervals of 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours after the operation. The span of the sensory block and postoperative analgesia were assessed.
ResultsThe inclusion of intrathecal dexamethasone with bupivacaine resulted in a significant enhancement in the duration of pain relief during the intervention, lasting for an average of 473.4 ± 39.95 minutes (p<0.001). The duration of sensory and motor block analgesia in the intervention group was more than the control group (128.32 ± 7.30 vs. 92.84 ± 7.84) and (155.6±12.34 vs. 126.16±11.89), respectively (p<0.001). Pain score on the VAS scale at 30, 60, and 120 minutes was significantly lower in the intervention group (p<0.001). There was no difference in side effects and onset time between the study groups.
ConclusionThe inclusion of intrathecal dexamethasone alongside bupivacaine has demonstrated enhancement in the duration of sensory block during spinal anesthesia. This improvement was observed without any alterations in the time it takes for the anesthesia to take effect and without any adverse effects during the postoperative period.
Keywords: Pain Control, Intrathecal Dexamethasone, Spinal Anesthesia, Bupivacaine -
Background
Spinal anesthesia is considered to be the safest method of anesthesia for cesarean sections in patients with preeclampsia. Patients with preeclampsia are at an increased risk of experiencing severe hypotension following spinal anesthesia, which could have more profound and deleterious effects on both the fetus and the mother. However, bupivacaine, the most commonly used drug, can induce severe hypotension even at low doses. The purpose of this study is to minimize post-spinal hypotension in both the mother and the fetus.
ObjectivesTo determine and compare the reduction in hypotension following spinal anesthesia in patients with preeclampsia between the ropivacaine and bupivacaine groups.
MethodsIn a randomized clinical trial, a total of 90 parturients with preeclampsia undergoing spinal anesthesia were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups: One receiving ropivacaine and the other receiving bupivacaine. The dose of spinal ropivacaine was 15 mg of a 0.5% solution, and the dose of bupivacaine was also 15 mg of a 0.5 % solution. Hemodynamic parameters, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate, were recorded following the administration of spinal anesthesia. Pain scores and the time until the return of motor movement were also documented.
ResultsFor statistical analysis, the t-test, Chi-square, and ANOVA tests were utilized to compare the groups. Demographic variables, including maternal age, gestational age, parity, and gravidity, were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The trend of mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was significantly lower in the bupivacaine group compared to the ropivacaine group at all measured time points in the study (P < 0.05). The amount of ephedrine used after spinal anesthesia was significantly different at 2 and 4 minutes in the ropivacaine group compared to the bupivacaine group (P = 0.012, P = 0.025). Post-operative pain scores at 1 hour in recovery were not significantly different between the ropivacaine and bupivacaine groups (P = 0.015). The time to knee movement was also significantly shorter in the ropivacaine group compared to the bupivacaine group (P < 0.001).
ConclusionsRopivacaine reduces the incidence of hypotension in spinal anesthesia compared to bupivacaine for cesarean section in patients with preeclampsia. This is attributed to a lower occurrence of spinal-induced hypotension, improved hemodynamic control, reduced ephedrine usage, and faster patient ambulation. A future study could focus on investigating different dosages of both drugs with a larger number of participants.
Keywords: Block, Bupivacaine, Hypotension, Preeclampsia, Ropivacaine, Spinal -
Background
Pain control is one of the most important issues in femoral fractures. One of the most effective methods is the fascia iliaca compartment block.
ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine on the quality of ultrasound guided blockade of the fascia iliaca compartment in adults undergoing femoral shaft fracture surgery.
MethodsThis study was a double-blind clinical trial. We studied 60 adults who were hospitalized for a femoral shaft fracture. The patients were divided into two equal groups receiving either bupivacaine alone or bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine for compartment blockade of the iliac fascia. Group allocation was based on the method of randomization from concealed envelopes. Primary outcomes were pain intensity, sedation and analgesic consumption assessed at 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours after surgery in two groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS software.
ResultsPain intensity was lower in the dexmedetomidine group 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours after surgery (p<0.05). The sedation score was also higher in the dexmedetomidine group 6 and 24 hours after surgery (p<0.05). The dose of analgesics used by the dexmedetomidine group was significantly lower 6 and 24 h after treatment. No hypotension, respiratory depressionand bradycardia occurred in the patients participating in this study.
ConclusionThe addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine during ultrasound-guided blockade of the fascia-iliac compartment is associated with reduced pain intensity and improved sedation in patients undergoing femoral fracture surgery.
Keywords: Bupivacaine, Dexmedetomidine, Fascia iliaca compartment block, Post-operative pai -
Background
Bupivacaine hydrochloride is widely used as the primary drug for spinal anesthesia.
ObjectivesThis research aimed to evaluate the intrathecal administration of both isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine (HB) in lower abdominal surgery.
MethodsA randomized, controlled, double-blind trial was conducted on 50 patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I to II, scheduled for lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia. The patients were allocated randomly into two groups of similar size. Group A (control group) received 20 mg HB 0.5% intrathecally. Group B (case group) received 10 mg HB 0.5% and 10 mg isobaric bupivacaine (IB) 0.5%.
ResultsThere was a significant decline in heart rate and mean arterial pressure in Group A compared to Group B (P < 0.05). Group A had a significantly greater sensory level at 10 and 20 minutes than Group B (P = 0.008 and 0.006, respectively). Group A had an earlier duration in reaching Bromage 3 and the first need for analgesia, compared to group B (P = 0.001 and 0.003, respectively).
ConclusionsIn lower abdominal surgery, the intrathecal administration of HB with IB increased hemodynamic stability and duration of both sensory and motor blockade but with slower recovery from anesthesia compared to HB alone.
Keywords: Intrathecal, Hyperbaric, Isobaric, Bupivacaine -
Background
Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) are used in multiple surgical fields to provide a high level of regional pain relief with a favorable adverse effect profile. PNBs aim to decrease overall perioperative pain and lower systemic analgesic requirements. Short-acting anesthetic agents are commonly given as single-injection PNBs for pain relief, typically lasting less than 24 hours. Liposomal bupivacaine is a newer anesthetic formulation lasting up to 72 hours as a single-injection PNB and may allow patients to recover postoperatively with a lower need for opioid analgesics.
ObjectivesThis study investigates peri- and postoperative pain and opioid use in patients receiving a long-acting brachial plexus PNB for hand surgery.
MethodsA retrospective review of patients who underwent a long-acting PNB using liposomal bupivacaine in the brachial plexus for minor hand operations was performed between July 2020 and May 2023 in Florida, USA. Patients were administered a ten-question survey regarding perioperative pain levels, post-operative symptoms, patient satisfaction, postoperative opioid use, and postoperative non-opioid analgesics.
ResultsOne hundred three patients, including 21 males and 82 females with an average age of 68.3 ± 15.8 years, completed a survey (34.2% response rate). Patients reported a considerable reduction in pain from 7.9 ± 2.2 out of ten before the PNB to 1.6 ± 1.8 in the perioperative period, 4.3 ± 2.7 in postoperative days zero to three, and 3.8 ± 2.4 in postoperative days four and five. Nerve block effects lasted a mean of 2.2 ± 2.0 days and patients reported a high level of satisfaction regarding their pain management plan with a score of 9.4 ± 1.4 out of ten. 20.4% of patients were prescribed opioids and 41.7% used NSAIDs postoperatively.
ConclusionsLiposomal bupivacaine PNBs effectively reduced peri- and postoperative pain with pain relief lasting 2.2 ± 2.0 days. Patients were highly satisfied with their pain management and there was a low rate of postoperative opioid prescription. Given these results, long-acting PNBs have the potential to significantly improve patient satisfaction, reduce anesthesia use, and reduce postoperative opioid prescription.
Keywords: Outpatient Surgery, Nerve Block, Analgesics, Opioid, Pain Management, Bupivacaine, Anesthesiology, Pain, Postoperative -
Introduction
Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is now a well-established technique in postoperative analgesia for lower abdominal surgeries. We aimed to investigate the effects of adding dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine used in USG (TAP block on postoperative pain and complications in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.
Materials and MethodsAbout 66 eligible patients enrolled in the survey. They were randomly assigned to one of the two groups of 20 CC of bupivacaine 0.5% + 1 CC Normal saline or 20 CC of bupivacaine 0.5% + 100µg dexmedetomidine. The amount of pethidine consumption, postoperative VAS score, and complications were measured. Patients were evaluated at the recovery ward (T0) and 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. Regarding the VAS score and if the patient's pain complained from a VAS≥3, pethidine 0.5 mg/kg was administered. The total dose, the average dose of pethidine used, and the first time of pethidine administration after the nerve block was recorded.
ResultsTwo groups had no significant difference regarding baseline characteristics. A significant difference was found at T4 about VAS (P=0.005). The amount of pethidine consumption was lower in the DEX group but not statistically significant except for T4 (P=0.006). The two groups showed no difference regarding side effects such as PONV.
Concussion:
Injection of dexmedetomidine in combination with bupivacaine for TAPB is an effective and safe drug for controlling pain after hernia surgery.
Keywords: Transversus abdominis plane block, Bupivacaine, Dexmedetomidine, Inguinal hernia -
Background
Caudal block is a common, safe, and effective anesthetic technique for lower abdominal, urological, and lower extremity surgeries in pediatrics.
ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular effects of adjuvant epinephrine in the caudal block on heart rate and blood pressure changes in children.
MethodsThis double-blind, randomized clinical trial was performed on 60 children who underwent elective infra-umbilical surgeries. They were under general anesthesia with midazolam, fentanyl, lidocaine, and propofol. The patients were ventilated through laryngeal mask airway (LMA), and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane in O2 and N2O mixture. The intervention group received a caudal block with 0.2% bupivacaine and 1/200000 epinephrine (1 mL/kg), while the control group received a caudal block without epinephrine. Heart rate, blood pressure, and ECG were monitored before the block and in the first, fifth, and 20th minutes after surgery.
ResultsThe two groups showed no statistically significant differences in demographics and systolic and diastolic blood pressures. However, sinus arrhythmia was more prevalent in the study group in the first minute after the block (P < 0.001). No differences were observed in the incidence of arrhythmia in the fifth and 20th minutes after the block.
ConclusionsIt appears that epinephrine as an adjuvant to the caudal block does not have long-lasting effects after the block, except sinus tachycardia in the first minute. Considering that no changes in blood pressure and other hemodynamic parameters were observed, it seems that epinephrine can be used safely in the caudal block in pediatric patients.
Keywords: Caudal Anesthesia, Bupivacaine, Epinephrine, Arrhythmia -
Introduction
Bupivacaine is one of the most widely used local anesthetics in spinal anesthesia. Clonidine is a known adjuvant added to prolong the duration of anesthesia. Amongst the complications related to spinal block, neurological complications can be the most troublesome.
Case PresentationWe presented a case where the reversal of motor and sensory blockade after spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine and clonidine was extremely delayed in the absence of any neurological injury.
ConclusionsSuch cases remind the significance of timely and elaborate assessment in the detection of iatrogenic complications and the unpredictability of physiological and pharmacological interactions.
Keywords: Spinal Anesthesia, Prolonged, Complication, Clonidine, Bupivacaine -
BackgroundSeveral adjuvants, added to local anesthetics, were suggested to induce an ideal regional block with high-quality analgesia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the particular blocking properties of low-dose bupivacaine in combination with meperidine and fentanyl in spinal anesthesia during Cesarean sections.MethodsA randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted at Hafez Hospital affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Shiraz, Iran) from February 2015 to February 2016. A total of 120 pregnant women, who underwent spinal anesthesia during elective Cesarean section were enrolled in the study. Based on block-wise randomization, the patients were randomly assigned to three groups, namely “B” group received 2 mL bupivacaine 0.5% (10 mg), “BM” group received 8 mg bupivacaine and 10 mg meperidine, and “BF” group received 8 mg bupivacaine and 15 µg fentanyl intrathecally. The block onset, the duration of analgesia, and the time of discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) were all assessed. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 21, and P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.ResultsThe mean duration of motor blocks in the B group (150 min) were significantly higher than the BM (102 min) and BF (105 min) groups (P<0.0001). In both the BM and BF groups, the duration of sensory and motor blocks was the same. The length of stay in the PACU was significantly longer in the B group (P<0.001) than the BM and BF groups. When meperidine or fentanyl was added to bupivacaine, the duration of the analgesia lengthened (P<0.001).ConclusionIntrathecal low-dose spinal anesthesia induced by bupivacaine (8 mg) in combination with meperidine and/or fentanyl for Cesarean section increased maternal hemodynamic stability, while ensuring effective anesthetic conditions, extending effective analgesia, and reducing the length of stay in PACU.Trial Registration Number: IRCT2015013119470N14.Keywords: Bupivacaine, Anesthesia, spinal, Local anesthesia, Meperidine, Fentanyl, Cesarean Section
-
Background
Pain is associated with increased sympathetic activity leads to tachycardia, elevated blood pressure and myocardial insults so pain control is necessary during the surgery and in the postoperative period. Aim of the study was to study the effect of intravenous dexamethasone on the duration of analgesia provided by supraclavicular block (SCB) for upper limb surgery.
Methods75 patients, age between 18 to 70 years of either sex, ASA class I and II, who were undergoing upper limb surgery randomized into three groups of 25 patients each by computer generated random number. Group S - 25 patients were given 5ml of normal saline intravenously along with ultrasound-guided SCB with 25ml 0.5% bupivacaine. Group DF - 25 patients were given 4mg intravenous dexamethasone in 5ml normal saline along with ultrasound-guided SCB with 25ml 0.5% bupivacaine. Group DE - 25 patients were given 8mg intravenous dexamethasone in 5ml normal saline along with ultrasound-guided SCB with 25ml 0.5% bupivacaine.
ResultsThe demographic data were comparable in all groups. The VAS score was significantly lower in Group DF and DE compared to Group S at 3,4,6,8,10,12 and 24 hours, with p values < 0.0001 at 3,4,5,6,8,10 and 12 hours and p value 0.0002 at 24 hours. The VAS scores between the groups DF and DE were comparable at 3,4,5,6,8,10,12 and 24 hours without any significant difference. The time for first rescue analgesia was significantly in Group DF and DE compared to Group S (p value <0.0001). There was no significant difference between the groups DF and DE in the time for first rescue analgesia (p value 0.75).
ConclusionWe conclude that dexamethasone used intravenously even in lower doses as 4mg along with supraclavicular brachial plexus block effectively increases the duration of analgesia and motor blockade, shortens the onset of sensory and motor blockade, reduces the total analgesic requirement in the first 24 hours after surgery.
Keywords: Analgesia, Bupivacaine, Dexamethasone, Pain -
Background
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is usually performed as a day care procedure for diseases involving the gall bladder. Pain in the immediate post-operative period is due to multiple factors and hence different modalities of pain relief are used. The present study was conducted to study the effectiveness of Peri-operative Multi-Modal Analgesia with Ultrasound guided Bilateral Subcostal TAP block for Post-operative analgesia in 60 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
MethodsIn this hospital based, randomized prospective interventional study patients were randomly allocated into 4 groups of 15 in each group, Group B received Bilateral Ultrasound guided Subcostal TAP Block with 20 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine, Group P received Tab Pregabalin tablet 150 mg, Group D received Inj Dexamethasone 8 mg IV and Group C was the control group. The hemodynamic changes like heart rate, blood pressure, saturation was monitored both intra and post operatively. The post-operative VAS scoring, duration of analgesia, time for first rescue analgesic and the total dose of analgesics in 24 hours were noted.
ResultsThe VAS Scores indicated that Group B> P> D> C provided better analgesia to the patients with a P Value of < 0.01. Group B took the longest mean duration (6.8± 1.15 hours) to take the 1st rescue analgesic and least mean total dose of rescue analgesic in 24 hours followed by Group P, Group D and Group C which was statistically significant.
ConclusionUSG guided B/L TAP Block was superior to other modalities in providing postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Keywords: Transversus abdominis plane block, Bupivacaine, Dexamethasone, Pregabalin, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Post-operative analgesia -
Context:
The type of anesthesia in cesarean section can affect the mother and baby. This study aimed to determine the comparative effect of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine vs. hyperbaric ropivacaine on maternal and neonatal outcomes after cesarean section.
Evidence Acquisition:
PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar, IranDoc, MagIran, and Scopus databases were searched from 1 September 2022 to 1 November 2022. Eighteen clinical trials with 1542 patients were included in the analysis.
ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in hypotension, bradycardia, and Apgar score between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The risk of nausea (relative risk (RR), 1.526; 95% CI, 1.175 - 1.981; P = 0.001) and vomiting (RR, 1.542; 95% CI, 1.048 - 2.268; P = 0.02) caused by bupivacaine was 0.53% and 0.54% higher than that of ropivacaine. The incidence of shivering (RR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.480 - 3.39; P = 0.00) was 2.24 times higher in the bupivacaine group than in the ropivacaine group. The average onset time of sensory block (standardized mean difference (SMD), -0.550; 95% CI, -1.054 to -0.045; P = 0.032) and motor block (SMD, -0.812; 95% CI, -1.254 to -0.371; P = 0.000) was significantly lower in the bupivacaine group than in the ropivacaine group.
ConclusionsDespite the fact that ropivacaine and bupivacaine are effective in cesarean section, ropivacaine is more favorable because of lesshemodynamicchanges, less duration of sensoryandmotorblock, andfewer side effects, whichare effective in patient recovery.
Keywords: Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine, Spinal Anesthesia, Cesarean Section, Mothers -
Background
Postoperative analgesia is of utmost importance in the treatment of patients undergoing surgery. Good postoperative pain management reduces hospital stay and improves early ambulation. This study compared the efficacy of epidural bupivacaine with buprenorphine to butorphanol in lower limb orthopedic surgery.
ObjectivesThis study was carried out to investigate the onset of analgesia, the extent of analgesia, sedation score, and side effects of butorphanol with bupivacaine versus buprenorphine with bupivacaine.
MethodsIn a clinical trial study, 100 patients who underwent elective orthopedic lower limb surgery were randomly allocated to two groups. A total of 100 patients with American Society of anesthesiologists grades I and II posted for lower limb orthopedic surgery were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind study. The patients were divided into groups A and B. Subarachnoid block was achieved with 3.4 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine. The pain was monitored by the visual analog scale postoperatively. The patients in group A received bupivacaine with buprenorphine, and group B received bupivacaine with butorphanol when they complained of pain in the postoperative period. The onset of analgesia, duration of analgesia, sedation score, and side effects were compared between the two groups.
ResultsThe onset of analgesia was observed earlier in group A than in group B (7.7 ± 1.6 vs. 12.6 ± 1.7 minutes, P < 0.001). The duration of analgesia was longer in group A than in group B (590 ± 40 vs. 480 ± 54 minutes, P < 0.001). Pulse rates and mean arterial pressures were significantly different (P < 0.001). Side effects were common in both groups.
ConclusionsBuprenorphine added to bupivacaine provides earlier onset and longer postoperative epidural analgesia than epidural butorphanol with bupivacaine.
Keywords: Epidural Analgesia, Bupivacaine, Butorphanol, Buprenorphine -
مقدمه
در بی حسی نخاعی بی دردی پس از عمل و همچنین بی دردی و بی حرکتی حین اعمال جراحی یکی از مسایلی بسیار مهم می باشد که بر نتیجه جراحی و رضایتمندی جراح تاثیر بسزایی دارد. لذا، هدف از انجام این مطالعه مقایسه تاثیر روپیواکایین و بوپیواکایین بر میزان تغییرات همودینامیک در بیماران تحت عمل جراحی نفرولیتوتریپسی با بی حسی اسپاینال، می باشد.
روشاین مطالعه از نوع کارآزمایی بالینی تصادفی شده دو سویه کور می باشد. در این مطالعه 93 نفر از بیماران تحت عمل جراحی نفرولیتوتریپسی با کلاس بیهوشی I و II وارد مطالعه شدند. بیماران به صورت تصادفی به دو گروه بوپیواکایین و روپیواکایین تقسیم شدند. ابزار جمع آوری اطلاعات در این مطالعه شامل چک لیست حاوی اطلاعات: سن، جنسیت، فشار خون سیستول، دیاستول، ضربان قلب و میزان درصد اشباع اکسیژن خون شریانی می باشد. تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS نسخه 21 و آمارهای توصیفی و آزمون های آماری استنباطی در سطح معنی داری P<0.05 صورت گرفت.
یافته ها:
نتایج مطالعه حاضر نشان داد که گروه های بوپیواکایین و روپیواکایین از لحاظ جنسیت همسان بودند. نتایج آزمون آماری تی تست نشان داد که بین گروه های بوپیواکایین و روپیواکایین از لحاظ فشارخون سیستول و دیاستول، تنگی نفس تفاوت آماری معنی داری وجودنداشت. بین گروه های بوپیواکایین و روپیواکایین از لحاظ ضربان قلب در زمان ده دقیقه تفاوت معنی دار وجودداشت (P=0.038)، ولی در زمان های دیگر بین دو گروه تفاوت معنی دار وجودنداشت. میانگین ضربان قلب در زمان ده دقیقه، در گروه روپیواکایین بالاتر از گروه بوپیواکایین مشاهده شد.
نتیجه گیری:
نتایج مطالعه حاضر بیانگر آن بود که بین دو گروه روپیواکایین و بوپیواکایین بر میزان تغییرات همودینامیک در بیماران تحت عمل جراحی نفرولیتوتریپسی با بی حسی اسپاینال تفاوت آماری معنی داری وجودندارد. پیشنهاد می شود مطالعات آتی با حجم نمونه بالاتر و با دوزهای بالاتر انجام شود.
کلید واژگان: بوپیواکایین, روپیواکایین, نفرولیتوتریپسی, همودینامیک, اسپاینالIntroductionPostoperativeanalgesia and immobility are among the most important issues that significantly impact surgical outcomes and surgeon satisfaction. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effects of ropivacaine and bupivacaine on the extent of hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing nephrolithotripsy surgery with spinal anesthesia.
MethodsThis study is a double-blind randomized clinical trial. In total, 93 patients who underwent nephrolithotripsy surgery with anesthesia classes 1 and 2 were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: bupivacaine and ropivacaine. The data collection tool in this study included a checklist containing information; Age, gender, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and arterial blood oxygen saturation percentage.
ResultsThe results of the present study showed that the bupivacaine and ropivacaine groups were similar in terms of gender. The results of Ozone's t-test showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the bupivacaine and ropivacaine groups in terms of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, shortness of breath. There was a significant difference between bupivacaine and ropivacaine groups in the heart rate in ten minutes (P=0.038). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups at other time points. The average heart rate in 10 min was higherin the ropivacaine group than in the bupivacaine group.
ConclusionThe results of the present study indicated no statistically significant difference between the ropivacaine and bupivacaine groups regarding the number of hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing nephrolithotripsy surgery with spinal anesthesia. Further studies with higher sample sizes and higher doses.
Keywords: Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine, Nephrolithotripsy, Hemodynamic, Spinal -
BackgroundPre-emptive analgesia using pudendal nerve block (PNB) with bupivacaine is commonly used in clinical practice during perineal, pelvic floor or vaginal surgeries. However, its effectiveness is unclear. We conducted this review to synthesize short- and intermediate-term outcomes of pre-emptive analgesia using pudendal nerve block with bupivacaine.MethodsWe searched the CENTRAL, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, and Open Grey from inception until April 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of women who underwent perineal, pelvic floor or vaginal surgeries and received pre-emptive analgesia using a pudendal nerve block were included. Two authors independently screened, selected and performed data extraction as well as quality assessment on eligible trials. Disagreements were resolved via consensus. Data were narratively synthesized; when possible, data were pooled in RevMan 5 using the random-effects model.ResultsFour RCTs with a total of 349 participants were eligible for inclusion. We found evidence of improvement in postoperative pain scores; requirements for opioids, standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.89 (95% CI: -1.19, -0.59) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories SMD -1.04 (95% CI: -1.64, -0.43) in favor of the PNB versus control group. The risk ratio for adverse effects of postoperative nausea and vomiting, 0.42 (95% CI: 0.18, 0.99) favored PNB. There was no significantdifference between groups for the length of hospital stay, mean difference -0.82 (95% CI: -5.34, 3.69) and return to regular activity.ConclusionWe found limited evidence that pre-emptive pudendal block using bupivacaine improves postoperative pain and recovery in perineal, pelvic floor or vaginal surgeries. However, due to the heterogeneous nature of evidence, well-designed RCTs are required.Keywords: Pre-emptive Analgesia, Bupivacaine, Pudendal Nerve Block, Vaginal Surgery, Pelvic organ prolapse, Meta-analysis
-
مقدمه و هدف
این روش بی حسی با عوارضی نظیر تهوع، استفراغ و خارش همراه است؛ لذا این مطالعه با هدف تعیین تاثیر دوزهای مختلف فنتانیل اینتراتکال بر روی کیفیت و کمیت زمان بی دردی در سزارین مادران مولتی پار به انجام رسید.
روش اجرای تحقیق:
این مطالعه کارآزمایی بالینی تصادفی شده، 60 زن باردار داوطلب سزارین انتخابی مولتی پار با روش بیهوشی اسپاینال انجام شد. در این پژوهش افراد به صورت تصادفی در دو گروه درمانی (بوپی واکایین و فنتانیل (با دوزهای 15 و 25 میکروگرم) به داخل نخاع تزریق شد و در نهایت توسط نرم افزار آماری SPSS نسخه 26 مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند.
نتایجحداکثر سطح بلوک حسی در گروه 25 میکروگرم فنتانیل به صورت معناداری از گروه 15 میکروگرم فنتانیل بیشتر بود. حداکثر زمان ریکاوری کامل بلوک حرکتی در گروه 15 میکروگرم فنتانیل به صورت معناداری از گروه 25 میکروگرم فنتانیل بیشتر بود. عارضه استفراغ در گروه 15میکروگرم فنتانیل به صورت معناداری بیشتر از گروه 25 میکروگرم فنتانیل بود با این حال، زمان شروع بلوک حسی، حداکثر درجه بلوک حسی، کیفیت بی حسی حین عمل، مدت زمان جراحی، علایم حیاتی بیمار در حین عمل و عوارض بی حسی نظیر خارش و تهوع بین دو گروه مورد مطالعه تفاوت آماری معناداری نداشتند.
نتیجه گیری نهایی:
در نهایت می توان بیان نمود که درمان توام بوپی واکایین و فنتانیل (با دوزهای 15 و 25 میکروگرم) تفاوت آماری معناداری در شاخص های بی حسی و عوارض بی حسی (به جز حداکثر سطح بلوک حسی، حداکثر زمان ریکاوری و عارضه استفراغ) برقرار نبود.
کلید واژگان: بوپی واکائین, بی حسی نخاعی, سزارین, سطح بلوک حسی, فنتانیلthis anesthesia method is associated with side effects such as nausea, vomiting and itching; Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of determining the effect of different doses of intrathecal fentanyl on the quality and quantity of pain-free time in cesarean section of multiparous mothers.This randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 60 pregnant women who volunteered for multiple elective caesarean section with spinal anesthesia. In this study, subjects were randomly divided into two treatment groups (bupivacaine and fentanyl (with doses of 15 and 25 micrograms)) and were finally analyzed by SPSS version 26 statistical software.The maximum level of sensory block in the 25 micrograms fentanyl group was significantly higher than the 15 micrograms fentanyl group. The maximum recovery time of motor block in the 15 micrograms fentanyl group was significantly higher than the 25 micrograms fentanyl group. The complication of vomiting in the 15 micrograms group was significantly higher than the 25 micrograms group, however, the onset time of sensory block, the maximum degree of sensory block, the quality of anesthesia during surgery, the duration of surgery, the patient's vital signs during surgery, and anesthesia complications such as itching and nausea had no statistically significant difference between the two studied groups.it can be stated that the treatment with bupivacaine and fentanyl (with doses of 15 and 25 micrograms) did not have a statistically significant difference in anesthesia indicators and anesthesia complications (except the maximum level of sensory block, maximum recovery time and vomiting complication)
Keywords: Bupivacaine, Spinal anesthesia, Caesarean section, Level Of Sensory Block, Fentanyl -
Background
Hemodynamic instability, including hypotension and bradycardia, can occur due to spinal anesthesia by bupivacaine. However, it is possible to reduce the chance of hemodynamic changes by the reduction of the dose of bupivacaine and/or the addition of adjunctive agents.
ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare the effects of the addition of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and sufentanil to spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine in elective cesarean section (CS).
MethodsThis prospective single-blinded randomized clinical trial with parallel groups was performed on 60 pregnant women who were candidates for elective CS in Imam Reza Hospital in Kermanshah, Iran. In addition to receiving 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%, they were randomly divided into two groups to receive intrathecal sufentanil 5 μg (30 cases) or dexmedetomidine 5 μg (30 cases). Changes in blood pressure, heart rate, and occurrence of side effects (e.g., nausea, vomiting, headache, and shivering) were recorded within 1 h after the injections. Moreover, the postoperative analgesia rate and durati on (using a visual analog scale [VAS]) were recorded within the first 24 h after the completion o f the CS. Headache severity (using a VAS) was also measured during the first week after CS.
ResultsPatients declared their satisfaction with analgesia after surgery. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure changes during the first 60 min. Similarly, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of the severity of incision pain in the first 24 h after CS surgery. On days 3, 4, and 5, none of the patients in the sufentanil and bupivacaine group had headaches (VAS=0), but patients in the dexmedetomidine and bupivacaine group had some degree of headache (P=0.040).
ConclusionBased on the results, intrathecal administration of bupivacaine with either sufentanil or dexmedetomidine in CS did not have significantly different effects, except for slightly more severe headaches in the dexmedetomidine group. Therefore, no superiority of one drug over the other was observed for intrathecal administration with bupivacaine in CS.
Keywords: Bupivacaine, Cesarean section, Dexmedetomidine, Hemodynamic, Sufentanil
- نتایج بر اساس تاریخ انتشار مرتب شدهاند.
- کلیدواژه مورد نظر شما تنها در فیلد کلیدواژگان مقالات جستجو شدهاست. به منظور حذف نتایج غیر مرتبط، جستجو تنها در مقالات مجلاتی انجام شده که با مجله ماخذ هم موضوع هستند.
- در صورتی که میخواهید جستجو را در همه موضوعات و با شرایط دیگر تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مجلات مراجعه کنید.