A comparative study of the relation of mystic positions and states to the aphorisms made by the Ahle Beyt (peace be upon them)

Confronting the mystics, there emerge two extremes, one considering their words as revelations presenting, as proof, a single quoted verse or aphorism and some fiercely resisting them justifying their position by traditions cited against Sufism and the other opposite them severly and deny and result mystics such as Molavi, Attar, Hafez and… and justify their position with some the aphorisms made by the Ahle Beyt (A.S) in scorning of Sufism. This essay try to answer this question: does following of Ahle Beyt necessitate neglecting a lot of Irani-Islamic inheritance? Or we can find similar thought in the aphorisms made by the Ahle Beyt(A.S).Since this question is up to date and disputed the importance of this question Increace because not neglect of the aphorisms made by the Ahle Beyt(A.S)is acceptable nor laying aside a lot of Irani-Islamic inheritance is correct. The purpose of this essay is investigation of the extend of conformity between the aphorisms made by the Ahle Beyt(A.S) and mystic states and positions then conclude that a lot of mystic words conform with the aphorisms made by the Ahle Beyt(A.S) and the words uttered by mystical and Household signify mostly, a common point of view and they can be relied upon and the narration ascribed to the Ahle Beyt cited in opposition to Sufism are indicative of the deviation occasionally occurring in Sufism..