Causation, objectivity or subjectivity AComparative Study between Molla-Sadra and Hume

The causality always has been significant in the Thinkers View as a philosophical main Issue. Since denial or acceptance of causality have a direct effect in denial or acceptance of God Existence, as the First cause, both groups of atheist and theist philosophers have examined on this Issue seriously. Sadra According to originality of Being, believes that the Real Existence is Belong to the Self-existent who the other creatures have their own Existence from him. And Hume to deny the existence of God is Inevitable to deny the truth of causation. He with denying the fact of causation hold that what the man knows About Causality is nothing but Imaginations, association and mind habits. Based on that, the God existence imposed as manufacture of the humans mind. The atheism logically and intellectually is the Reason for Denial of the self-evident principle of causation and proof the accidence in the being of the creatures and leads to denial of the reality, Identity and existence of the being. And finally requires the sophistication and nihilism.The main fallacy of Hume in causation analysis is that he analysis the causation separate from the exact of being with the mere mentality. Whereas for correct proving and right analysis of causation it is necessary to considerate the deep link between ontology and epistemology and the relation between the mental world and the real one.