The Development of Per Impossibile from Aristotle to Quṭb al-Din Razi
Author(s):
Abstract:
Aristotle took Per Impossibile as a form of Hypothetical Syllogism which was composed of a Syllogistic and a non-syllogistic part. But he didnt express the relation between these two parts clearly. Alexander of Aphrodisias and Philoponus didnt add any specific comments to Aristotles view. Al-Farabi believed that Per Impossible includes three deductions: two categorical syllogisms and one exceptional syllogism; Avicenna introduced Connective Conditional Syllogism, and, based on it, he explained the relation between two parts that Aristotle propounded in Per Impossible. This interpretation is accepted by many of Islamic logicians, nevertheless Averroes followed Aristotles outline and ruled out Avicennas Connective Conditional Syllogism. Afḍal al-Din Maraqi took Aristotles opinion and clarified the relation between Syllogistic and non-syllogistic parts well, finally Quṭb al-Din Razi modified some aspects of Avicennas view.
Keywords:
Language:
Persian
Published:
Philosophy & kalam, Volume:49 Issue: 2, 2017
Page:
203
magiran.com/p1664730
دانلود و مطالعه متن این مقاله با یکی از روشهای زیر امکان پذیر است:
اشتراک شخصی
با عضویت و پرداخت آنلاین حق اشتراک یکساله به مبلغ 1,390,000ريال میتوانید 70 عنوان مطلب دانلود کنید!
اشتراک سازمانی
به کتابخانه دانشگاه یا محل کار خود پیشنهاد کنید تا اشتراک سازمانی این پایگاه را برای دسترسی نامحدود همه کاربران به متن مطالب تهیه نمایند!
توجه!
- حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران میشود.
- پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانههای چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمیدهد.
In order to view content subscription is required
Personal subscription
Subscribe magiran.com for 70 € euros via PayPal and download 70 articles during a year.
Organization subscription
Please contact us to subscribe your university or library for unlimited access!