A Critical Study on the View of Those Refuting Religious Science with Regard to the Norm for Distinguishing Religious Science from Nonreligious Science

The study has intended to survey the view of those refuting religious science. As they believe, there may not be found any norm by which one may attain religious science and nonreligious science separately. They study subject, method and goal of science with regard to two levels of mind and objective reality. In the case of the latter, they disagree any meaning of religiousness, while in the former, they separate the position of judgement from that of gathering and claim that only on the position of gathering one may speak of religious science. And finally it has been concluded that their explanation is based upon a fallacy in which the two positions of mind and objective reality have been replaced misleadingly, some of their claims oppose their epistemological principles, and some of their claims lack any proof and oppose what happened in the history of scienc.