The inevitable interference of presuppositions on understanding in judgment of reason and Quranic verses

Gadamer's most important claim of philosophical hermeneutics is the historicity or the historicity of understanding. In the book of truth and method, Gadamer considers different modes of understanding, including the generality mode of understanding, the synthetic mode of the understanding and the mode of the essential adherence to the understanding of fluid preconditions. His purpose of enumerating and analyzing each of these modes is to prove the historicity of understanding as a infinitival meaning of understanding (= to understand) that as a consequence the understanding of meaning of the gerund (= conceptual understanding) will also be historicity. This article first analyzes the notion of inevitable involvement of presuppositions in understanding, and then presents rational and analytical critique of this view. In the third part of the article, Gadamer's view is quantified in the scale of the implications of Quranic verses. Although the Quran is not an epistemological book, but the Quranic view of the subject can be inferred in the use of some verses. Here, the implication of the verses has been proven contrary to his claim.