Guided tissue regeneration and platelet rich growth factor for the treatment of Grade II furcation defects: A randomized double‐blinded clinical trial ‐ A pilot study

The treatment of furcation area defects remained as a challenging issue in periodontal treatments. Regeneration treatment of furcation defects is the most discussed periodontal treatment. Although not completely hopeless in prognosis, the presence of the furcation involvement significantly increases the chance of tooth loss. The current research was conductedeto compare theeadditive effect of combined guided tissue regeneration (GTR) and platelet‑rich growth factor (PRGF) on the treatment of furcation bony defects.
A randomized, triple‑blinded, split‑mouth study was designed. It included patients with a moderate to severe chronic periodontitis with bilateral Grade II furcation involvement of first or second mandibular molars. Each side of mouth was randomly allocated for the treatment with either Bio‑Gide American Society of Anesthesiologists GTR or a PRGF or PRGF by itself. Plaque index, gingival index, vertical clinical attachment level, vertical probing depth, recession depth (REC), horizontal probing depth, fornix to alveolar crest (FAC), fornix to base of defect (FBD), furcation vertical component and furcation horizontal component (FHC) were recorded. The current research was conducted to compare the additive effect of combined GTR and PRGF on treatment of furcation bony defects. Altman’s nomogram, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, Friedman test, general linear model, repeated measures, and paired t‑test were used as statistical analysis in this research. P Eight patients were finally enrolled for this study. Overly, general and specific clinical and furcation parameters were improved except REC that was deteriorated insignificantly and FAC improved not significantly. Intergroup comparison revealed better improvement of FHC in GTR/ PRGF group (P = 0.02).
A significant improvement in the Grade II furcation defects treated with either GTR or PRGF/GTR was noticed. Further large‑scale trials are needed to reveal differences of mentioned treatment in more details.