Clarifying the Scope of Principle of Beneficence and Its dependent effectiveness

From jurisprudential-legal point of view, a benefactor (Muhsin) is not only confined to the doer of an optional good deed, rather the doer of an unforbidden action is also included in the definition. To prove the license of occupation in other affairs, it is not possible only to refer to the principle of beneficence, rather the permissibility of beneficence should be first proved through another reason so that the action can be included in the principle of beneficence. To distinguish whether a benefactor (Muhsin) has got only the intention of a good action or does he practice the action, and also the scope of his authorities in any specific case, we should refer to a valid reason. Therefore, it is not correct merely to refer it to the principle of beneficence.