A Comparative Analysis on the Accuracy of Special and Prefabricated Impression Trays Using Additional Silicone in a Laboratory Model

Impression technique plays apivotal role infixed prosthodontic treatments; one of the main steps of impression is selection and preparation of an appropriate tray. Impression technique with insufficient accuracy causes distortions and complications that consequently result in treatment failure. The present study compares the impression accuracy of special and prefabricated trays in a laboratory model. This article compares the accuracy of special and prefabricated impression trays for achieving better impression and finally better crowns with good adaptation. In this study, a laboratory-fabricated resin model, resembling a mandibular first molar, was used on a dental arch and prepared by standard method for full crown restorations with a finish line of 1-mm depth and 3° to 4° convergence angle. Impression was made from a laboratory-fabricated resin model, 40 times with monophase medium-body polyvinyl siloxane in special trays and 40 times with putty and light-body polyvinyl siloxane using double-mix impression technique without spacer in prefabricated trays. To measure margin algap,distance between the restoration margin and preparation finish line was vertically determine done achdiein the mesial, distal,buccal,andlingualregions.Statistical analysis was performed and data were analyzed by SPSS20 software using independentsamples t-test. The data were significantly different at P < 0.05. The mean value of special tray impression (72.72) was lower than that of prefabricated tray impression (91.27). No significant difference was observed between two techniques in the mesial and buccal regions (P > 0.05). However, a significant difference wasreported between the techniques in the lingual and distal regions. The present study indicated a higher accuracy for the special tray impression than prefabricated tray impression.