A criticism on the justification of two Separate Divine Advent and two different Religions in a short period

As Mirza Ali Mohammad Shirazi claimed to be a new prophet at this age and gained followers for himself, some of them claimed to be his successor after his death. They claimed that they are the Promised Ones (the one who will be appeared by God) to whom Bab preached. One of the claimants who was able to attract more Babi was Mirza Hussein Ali Nouri, known as Baha’u’llah. He announced himself as the next prophet to appear. After that event, the Baha’is sought to justify the two successive advents of Bab and Bahá’u’lláh in less than ten years, and tried to justify it by special interpretation of the verses of the Qur’an and Hadiths, as well as the histories of double appearances in previous religions. This article responds to these justifications by showing that the use of verses and traditions and even the history of the prophets has been essentially insufficient in proving this, and the Baha’is and Baha’i leaders have interpreted the holy verses and narratives in their own favor.