A moderate Particularism approach from Sae'di's ethical perspective compared with the ethic of care

As beginning to know himself, human being felt an urgent need providing his psychological security whose presence brought security both for him and for those with him. This need associated with human spirit cannot be something other than ethics/morality. Since bearing a concealed esteem in nature, moral laws always carry enforcement which has caused the ethics to be in a level and dignity beyond a nation's movements and historical development. Within the limit of these morals, each culture and community defines and establishes itself. Undoubtedly, the key to the development of each nation's culture is the eternity of these ethics. Recognizing both human and morality in addition to the obligatory presence and enforcement of ethics in communities, Sae'di has accurately and deliberately found out that human spirit owns delicacy to fertilize moral individualities which demands some skills. Such skills are in a way that an overview on ethics should be avoided, which does not mean inclusion of morality for a special group in a community but considering the circumstance of each community, ethics should be defined in a way to be enforced every time and place. This issue, by nature, resembles a debate raised by psychologists as ethics of care in the 19th and 20th. The only difference between them is that the former one does exclude the latter one's extremism.