Analysis of balance for geomorphologic shapes, depend on Deyvis &Gylbert's point of views and it's adaptation with some Qoran'sinterpretations

In the fields of insight recognition, the significances are applied often differently, so despitehaving the same structure and domain in the matter, their coincidence's load varies in differentaspects. Geomorphologic's balance is one of the examples. The meaning of balance is appliedin all evolution aspects of Dayvis, in the field of systematic perception'sdistrict(ramesht1381p77) and also in the Qoran's interpretations. the Dayvis 's point of viewtime would encounter evolutions orgradually depletions, in other words they haveunreturnable changes in a way that this meaning has its origin in antropy's backgrounds andpositive feedbacks. but undoubtedly the balances meaning in dayvis's opinion differs with theqoran's systematic point of view.(chapters:naml,verse88,shams,verse6,meraj,verse9,alqare,verse5 and many others)thatexpresses the evolution, regularity, permanency and balance in the phenomenons. but with thegylbert's that the forms and processes could be related to negative feedbacks that thechangings are with different speeds and cause surfaces forms proportionaly vary with them.therefore the earth's forms are dependant to a situation which the forms that change in ashorter time. in this editorial is tried to analyze the conflicts and the similarities through thebasis of library studies. the issue will help to achieve a better comprehension from themeanings by encountering different views of balance in Geomorphology and also emphasiseson the importance of it's significances load, and the contrasts in different views.