Presenting a model for designing indigenous houses based on ethnomethology (Case study: Jiroft)

Qualitative indicators are always considered as the most sensitive tool in housing planning and creating a suitable environment with human needs is one of the main goals of housing to meet quantitative, qualitative and social needs. In recent times, with constructions that do not inspire the identity and meaning of life, and yet all constructions have found a single form and due to lack of sufficient knowledge of the needs of users, leading to problems such as the loss of cultural identity. And space and reduced satisfaction. While paying attention to the architecture arising from anthropology, the beliefs of the indigenous community have changed over time under the influence of various spatial and cultural components. School, new fields of research in sociology to emerge, especially in traditional issues, the possibility of explaining effective solutions for more quality of contemporary housing in Jiroft. This research has been done qualitatively and its method will be based on applied-developmental type which by expressing the anthropological goals of Jiroft city from hierarchical analysis method for final evaluation of data and from Expert Choice software to fuzzy calculations and decision technique Several criteria have been used and finally the prioritization of effective components in the formation of residential spaces in Jiroft has been developed. How to collect information based on checklists for interview techniques, observation and from documentary and library studies and descriptive study, Garfinkel theory is narrowed down and then by examining the main factors of different models, 22 effective components in the formation Residential spaces of contemporary houses in Jiroft were described. Then, by explaining the criteria and scoring the components, solutions to improve the quality aspects of contemporary housing were proposed. Based on the results of this study, the quality components of the residential environment were classified into six categories: controllability, livability, meaningfulness, flexibility, playability and playability. "Aesthetics" was selected as the most effective criterion and in the category of behaviorism, the criterion of "comfort and convenience" and in the category of flexibility, the criterion of "harmony with the human scale" was mentioned as the first priority and in the category of livability, the criterion of "relationship with nature" Finally, in the category of playability, the criterion of "safety and protection" was introduced compared to other effective criteria in the design of residential spaces.