A Comparative Study of Greimas's Existential Discourse in "Heyn Taraknã Aljsr" and "Peykar- e- Farhãd

In the narrative literature, the narrator finds himself against a shared world with others at the same time. Sometimes in different parts of the world, these differences become understandable. The Middle East, with its turbulent history, can create a similar mindset for contemporary observers. These psychological similarities to narrative expressions are a good way to address comparative research. This essay deals with an American-based descriptive-analytical approach to comparative exploration of narratives by "Abdul Rahmãn Manif" during “"Heyn Taraknã Aljsr" and "Peykar- e- Farhãd". These narratives lead the reader from reading the message from the beginning of the sender's message to the reader's various discourse textbooks to understand the relationships and internal composition of literary work in order to achieve the ultimate structure of narratives . In this research, sensorycognitive symptoms have been extracted from the study of novel texts and rules specific to the level of narrative structures. These signs in the course of the stream of consciousness of narrators propelled into the actions of the heroes and they led to the discovery of existential discourses in the semantic system. Objective signs that have become commonplace over time fall into a new chapter of semantic separation. Creating new meanings and temporal and post-temporal manifestations show aesthetic perceptions through semantic holes. By coming out of negative situations in order to achieve the transcendence of meaning, the Shushigars create the sequence of Bush's discourse. Bush's discourses are the product of stream of consciousness of the narrators' minds in the sensory-perceptual dimension and a leaping diagram of deprivation necessitates the creation of new and different signs.