Analysis of the Arrogance of Ali (as) and the Jews in the Khyber War Based on Van Dyke's Ideological Square

Critical discourse analysis is a visionary approach that is important in discovering the worldview of discourse. Theon van Dyke, one of the leading theorists in the field of critical discourse analysis, emphasized the ideological square theory by emphasizing that the ideological worldview can be represented in language. The present study uses a descriptive-analytical method and with the assumption that one can have a discourse reading of arrogance, examines the arrogance of Ali (AS) and the Jews in the Khyber War based on Van Dyke's ideological quadratic model in critical discourse analysis. Discover how to represent the ideology of the dialogue parties, deeper understanding of the layers of the text. The result of the research shows that in these arrogances, the atmosphere of conflict is represented by the discourse strategy of polarization between the two groups of Ali (AS) and his enemies. Similar, the absolute object of a kind and emphasis, presenting the news at the beginning and rhetorical approaches of simile, Makniyeh metaphor and lexical structures that have a negative ideological burden "Al-Kufra, the people of immorality" and lexical structures that have a positive ideological burden "Rabbi Khair Nasser, Amen Ballah" He pointed out that effective language plays an important role in marginalizing the arrogance of the opposition and propagating Islam and proving its legitimacy against the Jews.