Automatic Succession of International Organizations in International Law

It was first in 1971 that the international law commission sought to include the issue of succession in international organizations in its long-term agenda. But finally, concluded that the scope of codification and progressive development of the law on this subject is limited. Therefore, there was no need to address this issue further. The main focus of the growth of the issue of succession in international organizations is in one of the advisories of the international court of justice, especially the advisory theory of july 11, 1950 on the international situation in south africa and in the doctrine. The question we seek to answer in this article is the possibility of substitution in the relations between international organizations. If so, the basis for the occurrence, as some of the judges of the court have claimed, could be automatic substitution. The hypothesis of the article is also based on the fact that despite the possibility of a split in international organizations, its basis can not be considered as an automatic replacement. In relations between international organizations, the succession is based on an agreement between the two organizations, and the treaty concludes the effects and results of the succession.