Analysis of the Assassination of Iranian Nuclear Scientists from the Perspective of Domestic and International Law

During the years 2009 to 2021 six scientists related to Iran's nuclear technology has been the target of organized terrorist attacks by human rights violators Attacks that, despite being prohibited according to paragraph 1 of Article 6 of the International Covenant The 1966 United Nations Civil and Political Rights Act is much and human societies According to former Mossad chief Meir Dagan is more moral to create a massive war Mossad Meir Dagan former director following Dagan's belief in the sovereign territory of Iran led to gross human rights violations and took the lives of the 5 people. in question and their commanders Despite this , authors have been studying on Assassination basis case-by-case and they have analyzed using various domestic and international laws in order to answer the question that under what title or titles can a criminal title be analyzed in the Iranian and international legal system? And whether the claim of defense is acceptable or not? The results of the research indicate that due to the passage of two decades of approval UN Security Council Resolution 1373 and the non-criminalization of terrorism in the Iranian legal system Each assassination has a different criminal title and punishment, so merely committing an assassination does not create jurisdiction for a specific domestic criminal authority. In international law, according to circumstances of crimes against humanity in the Rome Statute approved in 1998, this behavior is an example of this international crime. Despite Iran's non-accession to the International Criminal Court (ICC), this judicial authority can be considered competent to hear. Also, citing Article 51 of the UN Charter and UN General Assembly Resolution 3314, the claim of defending the conduct is rejected.